Julia Probert

17 total papers · 414 total citations
11 papers, 270 citations indexed

About

Julia Probert is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Probert has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 270 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 4 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 3 papers in Developmental Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Julia Probert's work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (4 papers) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers). Julia Probert is often cited by papers focused on Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (4 papers) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers). Julia Probert collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Julia Probert's co-authors include Karin J. Neufeld, Charles H. Brown, Kaushik Mandal, Charles W. Hogue, Jing Tian, Kenton J. Zehr, Yohei Nomura, Atsushi Yamaguchi, Vidyulata Kamath and Michelle Burke Parish and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Anesthesiology and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

In The Last Decade

Julia Probert

8 papers receiving 268 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Julia Probert 186 130 126 93 56 11 270
Kimberly F. Rengel 243 1.3× 65 0.5× 89 0.7× 91 1.0× 34 0.6× 14 316
Luca Titi 109 0.6× 70 0.5× 111 0.9× 74 0.8× 63 1.1× 14 260
Kengo Maekawa 161 0.9× 166 1.3× 114 0.9× 48 0.5× 28 0.5× 14 275
C Praticò 97 0.5× 40 0.3× 89 0.7× 116 1.2× 23 0.4× 17 256
M. Mattheussen 65 0.3× 95 0.7× 77 0.6× 81 0.9× 81 1.4× 13 300
Victor De Castro 121 0.7× 96 0.7× 52 0.4× 150 1.6× 17 0.3× 11 274
Danielle Greaves 197 1.1× 141 1.1× 116 0.9× 63 0.7× 15 0.3× 14 294
Layth Al Tmimi 115 0.6× 99 0.8× 102 0.8× 100 1.1× 12 0.2× 22 245
Kamilia S. Funder 180 1.0× 128 1.0× 114 0.9× 63 0.7× 11 0.2× 15 305
Peter von Homeyer 189 1.0× 100 0.8× 79 0.6× 148 1.6× 9 0.2× 12 301

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Probert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Probert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Probert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Probert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Probert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Probert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Probert. The network helps show where Julia Probert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Probert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Probert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Probert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Probert. Julia Probert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026