Julia Looper

596 total citations
18 papers, 408 citations indexed

About

Julia Looper is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Looper has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 408 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 10 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Julia Looper's work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (17 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (10 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (9 papers). Julia Looper is often cited by papers focused on Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (17 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (10 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (9 papers). Julia Looper collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Brazil. Julia Looper's co-authors include Dale A. Ulrich, Rosa Angulo‐Barroso, Jianhua Wu, Chad Tiernan, Beverly D. Ulrich, Meghann Lloyd, Kristi Sayers Menear, Kristie Bjornson, Kathy Martin and Nora Shields and has published in prestigious journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Julia Looper

18 papers receiving 381 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julia Looper United States 10 334 164 161 75 71 18 408
Mary Rose Franjoine United States 5 356 1.1× 183 1.1× 57 0.4× 69 0.9× 111 1.6× 8 461
Silvia Letícia Pavão Brazil 17 603 1.8× 262 1.6× 67 0.4× 97 1.3× 178 2.5× 50 731
Elizabeth Williams Australia 5 194 0.6× 101 0.6× 50 0.3× 31 0.4× 53 0.7× 7 328
Roksana Malak Poland 6 131 0.4× 72 0.4× 90 0.6× 38 0.5× 43 0.6× 41 271
Adriana Neves dos Santos Brazil 12 354 1.1× 186 1.1× 32 0.2× 47 0.6× 110 1.5× 28 439
Sarah Love Australia 11 834 2.5× 182 1.1× 42 0.3× 30 0.4× 144 2.0× 22 925
Elena Beani Italy 12 218 0.7× 183 1.1× 27 0.2× 57 0.8× 83 1.2× 34 372
Jane Galvin Australia 14 299 0.9× 163 1.0× 60 0.4× 54 0.7× 98 1.4× 23 548
Karel G.B. Maathuis Netherlands 8 185 0.6× 75 0.5× 28 0.2× 37 0.5× 52 0.7× 9 303
Joanne Valvano United States 10 306 0.9× 151 0.9× 16 0.1× 107 1.4× 138 1.9× 20 419

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Looper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Looper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Looper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Looper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Looper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Looper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Looper. The network helps show where Julia Looper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Looper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Looper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Looper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Looper. Julia Looper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Fiss, Alyssa LaForme, et al.. (2024). Exploring the Efficacy of a Dynamic Harness System on Gross Motor Development and Motivation for Infants With Down Syndrome: A Pilot Study. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 36(4). 468–476. 1 indexed citations
2.
Fiss, Alyssa LaForme, et al.. (2023). Embedding Play to Enrich Physical Therapy. Behavioral Sciences. 13(6). 440–440. 7 indexed citations
3.
Looper, Julia, et al.. (2021). Current Trends in Pediatric Physical Therapy Practice for Children With Down Syndrome. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 33(2). 74–81. 2 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Beth A., et al.. (2021). Leg Movement Rate Pre- and Post-Kicking Intervention in Infants with Down Syndrome. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics. 41(6). 590–600. 4 indexed citations
5.
Looper, Julia, et al.. (2021). Promoting Participation in Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents With Down Syndrome. Physical Therapy. 101(5). 11 indexed citations
6.
Looper, Julia & Kathy Martin. (2020). The Effect of Supramalleolar Orthotic Use on Activity and Participation Skills in Children with Down Syndrome. JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 32(4). 222–228. 3 indexed citations
7.
Looper, Julia, et al.. (2019). Low-Intensity vs High-Intensity Home-Based Treadmill Training and Walking Attainment in Young Children With Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 101(2). 204–212. 9 indexed citations
8.
Looper, Julia, et al.. (2015). The relationship between transitional motor skills and locomotion. Infant Behavior and Development. 38. 37–40. 2 indexed citations
9.
Looper, Julia, et al.. (2012). How do toddlers increase their gait velocity?. Gait & Posture. 37(4). 631–633. 6 indexed citations
10.
Looper, Julia, et al.. (2012). What to Measure When Determining Orthotic Needs in Children With Down Syndrome. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 24(4). 313–319. 11 indexed citations
11.
Looper, Julia & Dale A. Ulrich. (2011). Does Orthotic Use Affect Upper Extremity Support During Upright Play in Infants With Down Syndrome?. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 23(1). 70–77. 11 indexed citations
12.
Wu, Jianhua, Julia Looper, Dale A. Ulrich, & Rosa Angulo‐Barroso. (2010). Effects of Various Treadmill Interventions on the Development of Joint Kinematics in Infants With Down Syndrome. Physical Therapy. 90(9). 1265–1276. 36 indexed citations
13.
Looper, Julia & Dale A. Ulrich. (2010). Effect of Treadmill Training and Supramalleolar Orthosis Use on Motor Skill Development in Infants With Down Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Physical Therapy. 90(3). 382–390. 38 indexed citations
14.
Wu, Jianhua, Dale A. Ulrich, Julia Looper, Chad Tiernan, & Rosa Angulo‐Barroso. (2007). Strategy adoption and locomotor adjustment in obstacle clearance of newly walking toddlers with down syndrome after different treadmill interventions. Experimental Brain Research. 186(2). 261–272. 48 indexed citations
15.
Wu, Jianhua, Julia Looper, Beverly D. Ulrich, Dale A. Ulrich, & Rosa Angulo‐Barroso. (2007). Exploring effects of different treadmill interventions on walking onset and gait patterns in infants with Down syndrome. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 49(11). 839–945. 72 indexed citations
16.
Ulrich, Dale A., Meghann Lloyd, Chad Tiernan, Julia Looper, & Rosa Angulo‐Barroso. (2007). Effects of Intensity of Treadmill Training on Developmental Outcomes and Stepping in Infants With Down Syndrome: A Randomized Trial. Physical Therapy. 88(1). 114–122. 105 indexed citations
17.
Looper, Julia, et al.. (2006). Changes in Step Variability of New Walkers With Typical Development and With Down Syndrome. Journal of Motor Behavior. 38(5). 367–372. 41 indexed citations
18.
Looper, Julia & Dale A. Ulrich. (2006). THE EFFECTS OF FOOT ORTHOSES ON GAIT IN NEW WALKERS WITH DOWN SYNDROME. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 18(1). 96–97. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026