Julia Hiscock

558 total citations
33 papers, 360 citations indexed

About

Julia Hiscock is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Hiscock has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 360 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in General Health Professions, 9 papers in Oncology and 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Julia Hiscock's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (7 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers). Julia Hiscock is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (7 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers). Julia Hiscock collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Julia Hiscock's co-authors include Frances S Mair, Richard D Neal, Rebecca‐Jane Law, Nefyn Williams, David E. Hojman, Clare Wilkinson, Joanna M Charles, Sadia Nafees, Elizabeth Evans and Rhiannon Tudor Edwards and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Tourism Management and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Julia Hiscock

29 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julia Hiscock United Kingdom 11 188 112 67 38 37 33 360
Sini Eloranta Finland 13 215 1.1× 81 0.7× 50 0.7× 17 0.4× 35 0.9× 39 466
Luciana Puchalski Kalinke Brazil 15 189 1.0× 142 1.3× 87 1.3× 27 0.7× 59 1.6× 119 606
Paul Sinfield United Kingdom 10 211 1.1× 139 1.2× 80 1.2× 30 0.8× 46 1.2× 18 397
Mervi Siekkinen Finland 9 194 1.0× 97 0.9× 119 1.8× 33 0.9× 17 0.5× 18 338
Elizabeth A. Bojarski United States 7 202 1.1× 41 0.4× 68 1.0× 45 1.2× 27 0.7× 9 366
Christine Jackson United Kingdom 13 144 0.8× 101 0.9× 40 0.6× 22 0.6× 24 0.6× 32 402
Seung Hee Choi United States 11 137 0.7× 98 0.9× 95 1.4× 40 1.1× 31 0.8× 37 510
Kia L. Davis United States 12 173 0.9× 82 0.7× 117 1.7× 33 0.9× 30 0.8× 29 450
Nagwa Hegazy Egypt 10 132 0.7× 103 0.9× 69 1.0× 24 0.6× 21 0.6× 54 388
Claudia M. Hardy United States 12 179 1.0× 143 1.3× 137 2.0× 33 0.9× 24 0.6× 36 444

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Hiscock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Hiscock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Hiscock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Hiscock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Hiscock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Hiscock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Hiscock. The network helps show where Julia Hiscock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Hiscock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Hiscock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Hiscock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Hiscock. Julia Hiscock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hendry, Annie, Daniel Walker, Nia Goulden, et al.. (2024). ‘ThinkCancer!’: randomised feasibility trial of a novel practice-based early cancer diagnosis intervention. BJGP Open. 8(3). BJGPO.2023.0220–BJGPO.2023.0220.
2.
Hiscock, Julia, Rebecca‐Jane Law, Kate Brain, et al.. (2024). Hidden systems in primary care cancer detection: an embedded qualitative intervention development study. British Journal of General Practice. 74(745). e544–e551.
3.
Goulden, Nia, Annie Hendry, Julia Hiscock, et al.. (2022). Earlier cancer diagnosis in primary care: a feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!. BJGP Open. 7(1). BJGPO.2022.0130–BJGPO.2022.0130. 3 indexed citations
5.
Law, Rebecca‐Jane, Joe Langley, Christopher R Burton, et al.. (2021). Promoting physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions in primary care: the Function First realist synthesis with co-design. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(16). 1–104. 5 indexed citations
6.
Law, Rebecca‐Jane, Joe Langley, Christopher R Burton, et al.. (2021). ‘Function First’: how to promote physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions managed in primary care? A study combining realist and co-design methods. BMJ Open. 11(7). e046751–e046751. 7 indexed citations
8.
Langley, Joe, Christopher R Burton, Julia Hiscock, et al.. (2020). Promoting physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions by primary care: Realist synthesis with co-design (Function First). 1 indexed citations
10.
Law, Rebecca‐Jane, et al.. (2019). The development of the Primary Care Clusters Multidimensional Assessment (PCCMA): A mixed-methods study. Health Policy. 124(2). 152–163. 9 indexed citations
11.
McCutchan, Grace, Julia Hiscock, Kerenza Hood, et al.. (2019). Engaging high-risk groups in early lung cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of symptom presentation and intervention preferences among the UK’s most deprived communities. BMJ Open. 9(5). e025902–e025902. 20 indexed citations
12.
Evans, Elizabeth, et al.. (2019). Percutaneous venting gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy for malignant bowel obstruction: a qualitative study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 9(4). 381–388. 13 indexed citations
13.
Hiscock, Julia, et al.. (2019). General medical services by non-medical health professionals: a systematic quantitative review of economic evaluations in primary care. British Journal of General Practice. 69(682). e304–e313. 17 indexed citations
14.
Wilkinson, Clare, Jessica Roberts, Bee Wee, et al.. (2017). 35 Carer-administration of as-needed sub-cutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in homebased dying patients: a uk study (CARIAD). BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 7(3). A360.2–A360. 1 indexed citations
15.
16.
Hiscock, Julia, et al.. (2017). Dying at home of cancer: whose needs are being met? The experience of family carers and healthcare professionals (a multiperspective qualitative study). BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 10(1). e6–e6. 21 indexed citations
17.
Hendry, Maggie, Richard Adams, Mererid Evans, et al.. (2016). Talking about human papillomavirus and cancer: protocol for a patient-centred study to develop scripted consultations. BMJ Open. 6(4). e011205–e011205. 3 indexed citations
18.
Hiscock, Julia, et al.. (2009). Complexity in simple tasks: a qualitative analysis of GPs’ completion of long-term incapacity forms. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 10(3). 254–254. 3 indexed citations
19.
Dowrick, Christopher, John Hughes, Julia Hiscock, Mark Wigglesworth, & Thomas Walley. (2007). Considering the case for an antidepressant drug trial involving temporary deception: a qualitative enquiry of potential participants. BMC Health Services Research. 7(1). 64–64. 8 indexed citations
20.
Hiscock, Julia & David E. Hojman. (1997). Social Policy in a Fast‐growing Economy: The Case of Chile. Social Policy and Administration. 31(4). 354–370. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026