Julia Gottschalk

2.4k citations
27 papers · 893 indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Gottschalk

23 papers receiving 883 citations

Peers

Julia Gottschalk
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Atmospheric Science 779
  • Environmental Chemistry 391
  • Oceanography 308
  • Paleontology 156
  • Earth-Surface Processes 104
Replace Laetitia Pichevin with:
Laetitia Pichevin United Kingdom
M. W. Schmidt United States
Hirofumi Asahi Japan
Takuya Sagawa Japan
Maureen H. Walczak United States
Götz Ruhland Germany
Rosanna Greenop United Kingdom
Georg Kirst Germany
Summer Praetorius United States
Alexandra Haase‐Schramm Germany
Julia Gottschalk relative to Laetitia Pichevin United Kingdom Laetitia Pichevin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Laetitia Pichevin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Gottschalk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Gottschalk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Gottschalk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Gottschalk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Gottschalk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Gottschalk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Gottschalk. The network helps show where Julia Gottschalk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Gottschalk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Gottschalk Line = papers co-authored together Julia Gottschalk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20243
3 20247
4 20235
5 20230
6 202239
7 202034
8 202074
9 201932
10 201919
11 201814
12 201725
13 2017109
14 201658
15 201637
16 2016114
17 201621
18 201522
19 201040
20
In Search of a Rational Sentence: A Return to the Concept of Appellate Review
19741

About Julia Gottschalk

Julia Gottschalk is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Atmospheric Science, Paleontology, Oceanography and Ecology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 893 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (23 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (15 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (11 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (5 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (4 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (3 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (3 papers) and Geological formations and processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (779 citations), Environmental Chemistry (391 citations), Oceanography (308 citations), Paleontology (156 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (104 citations). Julia Gottschalk has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Luke C Skinner, Claire Waelbroeck, Samuel L. Jaccard, Laurie Menviel, Jörg Lippold, Élisabeth Michel, A. E. Scrivner, Norbert Frank, Natalia Vázquez Riveiros and Hendrik Vogel. Their work appears in journals such as Quaternary Science Reviews, Nature Communications, Nature Geoscience, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Radiocarbon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026