Julia Foerster

467 citations
11 papers · 376 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Diatoms and Algae Research 4
    • Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology 2

Julia Foerster

11 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Julia Foerster
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Environmental Chemistry 101
  • Biotechnology 57
  • Ecology 141
  • Biomaterials 71
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 81
Replace Xiaoxia Hu with:
Xiaoxia Hu China
Weizhi Yao China
Jacqui McElhiney United Kingdom
Snædís H. Björnsdóttir Iceland
K. Venkat India
Yufang Lu China
Rakhee Khandeparker India
Larissa Hendrickx Belgium
Arnaud Muller‐Feuga France
J. Castritsi-Catharios Greece
Julia Foerster relative to Xiaoxia Hu China Xiaoxia Hu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Xiaoxia Hu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Foerster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Foerster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Foerster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Foerster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Foerster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Foerster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Foerster. The network helps show where Julia Foerster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Foerster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Foerster Line = papers co-authored together Julia Foerster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2004126
2 2013104
3 200854
4
The use of benthic algae, excluding diatoms and charales, for the assessment of the ecological status of running fresh waters: a case history from Germany
200422
5 200421
6 200518
7 202411
8 20187
9 20127
10 20155
11 20141

About Julia Foerster

Julia Foerster is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Ecology, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diatoms and Algae Research (4 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (2 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (2 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (2 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (1 paper), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (1 paper) and Bryophyte Studies and Records (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (101 citations), Biotechnology (57 citations), Ecology (141 citations), Biomaterials (71 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (81 citations). Julia Foerster has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jochen Schaumburg, Oliver Schlüter, Werner B. Herppich, Dietrich Knorr, Christine Schranz, Susanne C. Schneider, Gabriele Hofmann, Ursula Schmedtje, Jörg Ehlbeck and Matthias Baier. Their work appears in journals such as Water Research, Journal of Applied Phycology, Health Policy, Postharvest Biology and Technology and Computers and Electronics in Agriculture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact