Julia Brokaw

620 total citations
9 papers, 117 citations indexed

About

Julia Brokaw is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Brokaw has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 117 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 8 papers in Plant Science and 6 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Julia Brokaw's work include Plant and animal studies (9 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (8 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers). Julia Brokaw is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (9 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (8 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers). Julia Brokaw collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Julia Brokaw's co-authors include Jason Gibbs, Julianna K. Wilson, Rufus Isaacs, Gregory M. Loeb, Katja Poveda, Robert A. Rice, Heather Grab, Daniel P. Cariveau, Bethanne Bruninga‐Socolar and Zachary M. Portman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Ecology, Ecological Applications and Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

In The Last Decade

Julia Brokaw

9 papers receiving 117 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Julia Brokaw United States	5	110	72	61	37	27	9	117
Marion Renner Germany	4	116 1.1×	84 1.2×	63 1.0×	41 1.1×	31 1.1×	4	135
Logan Rowe United States	7	91 0.8×	63 0.9×	50 0.8×	28 0.8×	24 0.9×	11	111
Eric Venturini United States	7	146 1.3×	122 1.7×	106 1.7×	28 0.8×	20 0.7×	11	164
Bryony K. Willcox Australia	6	142 1.3×	86 1.2×	82 1.3×	39 1.1×	32 1.2×	7	174
Kyle Bobiwash Canada	5	124 1.1×	94 1.3×	61 1.0×	53 1.4×	20 0.7×	7	146
Alípio J.S. Pacheco Filho Brazil	8	136 1.2×	84 1.2×	63 1.0×	51 1.4×	27 1.0×	15	169
Carlos Zaragoza‐Trello Spain	7	77 0.7×	58 0.8×	40 0.7×	42 1.1×	19 0.7×	10	114
Gina M. Angelella United States	9	103 0.9×	138 1.9×	119 2.0×	26 0.7×	21 0.8×	17	187
Eneli Viik Estonia	7	82 0.7×	74 1.0×	53 0.9×	28 0.8×	27 1.0×	9	126

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Brokaw

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Brokaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Brokaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Brokaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Brokaw

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Brokaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Brokaw. The network helps show where Julia Brokaw may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Brokaw

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Brokaw. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Brokaw based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Brokaw. Julia Brokaw is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Müller, U, et al.. (2024). Successful pollinator seed mixes include low grass density and high forb richness across a range of total seeding densities. Restoration Ecology. 32(8). 1 indexed citations

Müller, U, Bethanne Bruninga‐Socolar, Julia Brokaw, Daniel P. Cariveau, & Neal M. Williams. (2024). Integrating perspectives on ecology, conservation value, and policy of bee pollinator seed mixes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 22(4). 4 indexed citations

Rowe, Logan, et al.. (2024). Pollinator planting establishment and bee visitation are influenced by seeding rate and post‐seeding management. Restoration Ecology. 32(5). 4 indexed citations

Brokaw, Julia, et al.. (2023). Seeding density of wildflower mixes affects nectar production in a focal plant species. Restoration Ecology. 31(7). 1 indexed citations

Brokaw, Julia, Zachary M. Portman, Bethanne Bruninga‐Socolar, & Daniel P. Cariveau. (2023). Prescribed fire increases the number of ground‐nesting bee nests in tallgrass prairie remnants. Insect Conservation and Diversity. 16(3). 355–367. 13 indexed citations

Crall, James D., et al.. (2020). Wind drives temporal variation in pollinator visitation in a fragmented tropical forest. Biology Letters. 16(4). 20200103–20200103. 11 indexed citations

Grab, Heather, Julia Brokaw, Jason Gibbs, et al.. (2019). Habitat enhancements rescue bee body size from the negative effects of landscape simplification. Journal of Applied Ecology. 56(9). 2144–2154. 43 indexed citations

Wood, Thomas J., Jason Gibbs, Nikki L. Rothwell, et al.. (2018). Limited phenological and dietary overlap between bee communities in spring flowering crops and herbaceous enhancements. Ecological Applications. 28(7). 1924–1934. 22 indexed citations

Brokaw, Julia, et al.. (2016). Forest and trees: Shade management, forest proximity and pollinator communities in southern Costa Rica coffee agriculture. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 32(5). 417–427. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact