Julia Blay‐Cadanet
About
In The Last Decade
Julia Blay‐Cadanet
4 papers receiving 99 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Infectious Diseases 53
- Immunology 31
- Epidemiology 24
- Molecular Biology 22
- Neurology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Blay‐Cadanet
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Blay‐Cadanet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Blay‐Cadanet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Blay‐Cadanet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Blay‐Cadanet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Blay‐Cadanet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Blay‐Cadanet. The network helps show where Julia Blay‐Cadanet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Blay‐Cadanet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Blay‐Cadanet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Blay‐Cadanet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Blay‐Cadanet. Julia Blay‐Cadanet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 57 | |
| 4 | 20 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.