Jui‐Teng Lin

2.0k citations
126 papers · 1.3k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Jui‐Teng Lin

114 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jui‐Teng Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 544
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 199
  • Radiation 111
  • Organic Chemistry 262
  • Ophthalmology 65
Replace Michael Müller with:
Michael Müller Germany
M. C. Gower United Kingdom
Glenn Holland United States
Ali S. Alnaser United Arab Emirates
I. Nikolov Italy
W. H. Lowdermilk United States
A. Compaan United States
G. Böhm Germany
Makoto Itoh Japan
Ansgar W. Schmid United States
Jui‐Teng Lin relative to Michael Müller Germany Michael Müller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael Müller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jui‐Teng Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jui‐Teng Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jui‐Teng Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jui‐Teng Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jui‐Teng Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jui‐Teng Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jui‐Teng Lin. The network helps show where Jui‐Teng Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jui‐Teng Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jui‐Teng Lin Line = papers co-authored together Jui‐Teng Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 126 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197659
2 201251
3 198346
4 198043
5 201942
6 198440
7 197736
8 201735
9 202033
10 198033
11 199032
12 198032
13 201628
14 199028
15 197626
16 198426
17 201926
18 199026
19 197925
20 199024

About Jui‐Teng Lin

Jui‐Teng Lin is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Organic Chemistry, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 126 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photopolymerization techniques and applications (22 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (18 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (16 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (13 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (12 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (12 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (11 papers) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (544 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (199 citations), Radiation (111 citations), Organic Chemistry (262 citations) and Ophthalmology (65 citations). Jui‐Teng Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and China. Frequent co-authors include Thomas F. George, Da‐Chuan Cheng, Hsia‐Wei Liu, Jacques Lalevée, E. L. Robinson, William C. Murphy, Hsinyu Lee, J. H. Hamilton, F. T. Avignone and Kiyoshi Katō. Their work appears in journals such as Polymers, Surface Science, Optics Communications, Journal of Polymer Research and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact