Judith Sangl
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Family Practice top 2%
- Co-authors
- Chunliu ZhanArlene S. BiermanGregg S. MeyerBruce FriedmanMarlene R. MillerRoselie A. BrightNilsa Loyo‐BerríosRonald G. Kaczmarek
- Topics
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (7 papers)Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Judith Sangl
17 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- General Health Professions 456
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 441
- Economics and Econometrics 422
- Surgery 281
- Family Practice 138
Countries citing papers authored by Judith Sangl
This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Sangl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Sangl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Sangl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Sangl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Sangl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Sangl. The network helps show where Judith Sangl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judith Sangl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judith Sangl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judith Sangl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Judith Sangl. Judith Sangl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 42 | |
| 5 | 196 | |
| 6 | 73 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | Variation in racial and ethnic differences in consumer assessments of health care. | 88 |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 451 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Consumer perspectives on information needs for health plan choice. | 61 |
| 16 | 92 | |
| 17 | Consumer knowledge of Medicare and supplemental health insurance benefits. | 65 |
| 18 | 1 |
About Judith Sangl
Judith Sangl is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (7 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (441 citations), Family Practice (138 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (49 citations). Judith Sangl has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Chunliu Zhan, Arlene S. Bierman, Gregg S. Meyer, Bruce Friedman, Marlene R. Miller, Roselie A. Bright, Nilsa Loyo‐Berríos, Ronald G. Kaczmarek, Barri Burrus and Robert L Kane. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.