Judith L. Eger
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Ecology top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 1%
- Paleontology top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Burton K. LimPaul D. N. HebertM. Brock FentonElizabeth L. ClareMark D. EngstromSergei V. KruskopMartin К. ObristCharles M. Francis
- Topics
- Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (24 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (16 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers)
- Journals
- NaturePLoS ONEMolecular Ecology
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomAustria
In The Last Decade
Judith L. Eger
35 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 859
- Ecology 641
- Ecological Modeling 396
- Paleontology 295
- Genetics 255
Countries citing papers authored by Judith L. Eger
This map shows the geographic impact of Judith L. Eger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith L. Eger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith L. Eger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Judith L. Eger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith L. Eger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith L. Eger. The network helps show where Judith L. Eger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judith L. Eger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judith L. Eger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judith L. Eger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Judith L. Eger. Judith L. Eger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 57 | |
| 5 | 50 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 197 | |
| 8 | 78 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 276 | |
| 11 | Use of DNA barcodes to understand Southeast Asian bat diversity | 1 |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Biogeography of the bats of Madagascar | 5 |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 56 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Judith L. Eger
Judith L. Eger is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Developmental Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (24 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (16 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (396 citations), Developmental Biology (178 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (859 citations). Judith L. Eger has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Burton K. Lim, Paul D. N. Hebert, M. Brock Fenton, Elizabeth L. Clare, Mark D. Engstrom, Sergei V. Kruskop, Martin К. Obrist, Charles M. Francis, Peter Schlegel and Natalya Ivanova. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, PLoS ONE and Molecular Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.