Judith C. Booij

986 total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 753 citations indexed

About

Judith C. Booij is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Judith C. Booij has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 753 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Ophthalmology and 4 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Judith C. Booij's work include Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers) and Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders (2 papers). Judith C. Booij is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers) and Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders (2 papers). Judith C. Booij collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. Judith C. Booij's co-authors include Arthur A. Bergen, Theo G. M. F. Gorgels, Dominique C. Baas, Peter J. van der Spek, Sigrid Swagemakers, Anke H. W. Essing, Annemieke J.M.H. Verkerk, Mary J. van Schooneveld, Camiel J.F. Boon and Ralph J. Florijn and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ophthalmology and Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

In The Last Decade

Judith C. Booij

9 papers receiving 741 citations

Hit Papers

The dynamic nature of Bru... 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Judith C. Booij Netherlands 7 518 475 247 109 71 9 753
Hoseong S. Yang United States 6 482 0.9× 559 1.2× 285 1.2× 69 0.6× 44 0.6× 6 812
Manlin Jin United States 11 373 0.7× 306 0.6× 209 0.8× 31 0.3× 55 0.8× 12 615
Debra L. Fleenor United States 7 324 0.6× 500 1.1× 210 0.9× 56 0.5× 106 1.5× 7 667
Tasneem P. Sharma United States 9 309 0.6× 204 0.4× 113 0.5× 55 0.5× 48 0.7× 17 473
Birgit Lorenz Germany 7 588 1.1× 383 0.8× 68 0.3× 105 1.0× 65 0.9× 10 720
Daniela Sanges Italy 12 768 1.5× 218 0.5× 72 0.3× 148 1.4× 124 1.7× 12 861
Bjørn Nicolaissen Norway 19 273 0.5× 290 0.6× 511 2.1× 123 1.1× 26 0.4× 60 844
Arcilee Frost United States 7 369 0.7× 493 1.0× 342 1.4× 107 1.0× 37 0.5× 9 726
Rogier M. Vos Netherlands 13 535 1.0× 178 0.4× 80 0.3× 127 1.2× 106 1.5× 19 610
Wenyi Wu China 13 352 0.7× 171 0.4× 99 0.4× 77 0.7× 29 0.4× 38 537

Countries citing papers authored by Judith C. Booij

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judith C. Booij's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith C. Booij with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith C. Booij more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judith C. Booij

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith C. Booij. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith C. Booij. The network helps show where Judith C. Booij may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judith C. Booij

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judith C. Booij. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judith C. Booij based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Judith C. Booij. Judith C. Booij is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Boon, Camiel J.F., L. Ingeborgh van den Born, Linda Visser, et al.. (2013). Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy. Ophthalmology. 120(4). 809–820. 90 indexed citations
2.
Booij, Judith C., Camiel J.F. Boon, Mary J. van Schooneveld, et al.. (2010). Course of Visual Decline in Relation to the Best1 Genotype in Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 117(7). 1415–1422. 23 indexed citations
3.
Booij, Judith C., Arne Bakker, H.J.M. Smeets, et al.. (2010). Simultaneous Mutation Detection in 90 Retinal Disease Genes in Multiple Patients Using a Custom-designed 300-kb Retinal Resequencing Chip. Ophthalmology. 118(1). 160–167.e3. 22 indexed citations
4.
Booij, Judith C., Jacoline B. ten Brink, Sigrid Swagemakers, et al.. (2010). A New Strategy to Identify and Annotate Human RPE-Specific Gene Expression. PLoS ONE. 5(5). e9341–e9341. 66 indexed citations
5.
Bergen, Arthur A., Judith C. Booij, Mary J. van Schooneveld, et al.. (2009). A Novel Strategy for Cost-Effective Mutation Detection in 87 Retinal Disease Genes Using Resequencing Chips. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 4125–4125. 1 indexed citations
6.
Booij, Judith C., S. van Soest, Sigrid Swagemakers, et al.. (2009). Functional annotation of the human retinal pigment epithelium transcriptome. BMC Genomics. 10(1). 164–164. 45 indexed citations
7.
Booij, Judith C., et al.. (2009). The dynamic nature of Bruch's membrane. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 29(1). 1–18. 429 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Booij, Judith C., et al.. (2005). Identification of mutations in the AIPL1, CRB1, GUCY2D, RPE65, and RPGRIP1 genes in patients with juvenile retinitis pigmentosa. Journal of Medical Genetics. 42(11). e67–e67. 73 indexed citations
9.
Booij, Judith C.. (1957). Cerebral function and chemical composition.. PubMed. 6. 648–58. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026