Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Angle-Resonant Stimulated Polariton Amplifier
2000617 citationsP. G. Savvidis, Jeremy J. Baumberg et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J.S. Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.S. Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.S. Roberts more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.S. Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.S. Roberts. The network helps show where J.S. Roberts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.S. Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.S. Roberts.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.S. Roberts based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J.S. Roberts. J.S. Roberts is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Benabid, Fetah, F. Couny, P. S. Light, & J.S. Roberts. (2008). Hollow-core PCFs enable high nonlinearity at low light levels. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU). 44(9). 61–64.1 indexed citations
Tibbits, T.N.D., Ian Ballard, K.W.J. Barnham, et al.. (2003). The potential for strain-balanced quantum well solar cells in terrestrial concentrator applications. 3rd World Conference onPhotovoltaic Energy Conversion, 2003. Proceedings of. 3. 2718–2721.4 indexed citations
10.
Seeds, A.J., et al.. (2003). Design, Fabrication and Characterisation of Normal-Incidence 1.56-µm Multiple-Quantum-Well Asymmetric Fabry-Perot Modulators for Passive Picocells. IEICE Transactions on Electronics. 86(7). 1281–1289.9 indexed citations
11.
Barnham, K.W.J., J.P. Connolly, M. Mazzer, et al.. (2003). Effect of barrier composition and well number on the dark current of quantum well solar cells. 3rd World Conference onPhotovoltaic Energy Conversion, 2003. Proceedings of. 3. 2706–2709.3 indexed citations
12.
Pantouvaki, Marianna, R. Feced, Martyn J. Fice, et al.. (2002). 40 Gb/s Optical Noise Suppression and Wavelength Conversion by MQW Saturable Absorber integrated in a Fabry-Perot cavity. UCL Discovery (University College London). 3. 1–2.6 indexed citations
13.
Ekins‐Daukes, Nicholas J., J.P. Connolly, K.W.J. Barnham, et al.. (2002). Strain-balanced quantum well solar cells. Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures. 14(1-2). 132–135.21 indexed citations
Hall, S., et al.. (1988). Direct coupled logic using an integrated, emitter-down, Schottky collector, heterojunction bipolar transistor with a MESFET load.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.