Joshua Williams
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 1%
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Co-authors
- John C. ShelleyYujie WuWolfgang DammWoody ShermanDevleena ShivakumarT. JahnkeM. S. SchöfflerR. Dörner
- Topics
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (23 papers)Atomic and Molecular Physics (19 papers)Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyRussia
In The Last Decade
Joshua Williams
34 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Molecular Biology 787
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 465
- Organic Chemistry 437
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 433
- Spectroscopy 234
Countries citing papers authored by Joshua Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Joshua Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joshua Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joshua Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joshua Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joshua Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joshua Williams. The network helps show where Joshua Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joshua Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joshua Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joshua Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joshua Williams. Joshua Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Revealing the two-electron cusp in the ground states of He and H<sub>2</sub> via quasifree double photoionization | 6 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 51 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the OPLS Force Fieldbreakdown → | 1497 |
| 20 | 14 |
About Joshua Williams
Joshua Williams is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Structural Biology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (23 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (19 papers) and Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (465 citations), Organic Chemistry (437 citations) and Spectroscopy (234 citations). Joshua Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include John C. Shelley, Yujie Wu, Wolfgang Damm, Woody Sherman, Devleena Shivakumar, T. Jahnke, M. S. Schöffler, R. Dörner, Th. Weber and Florian Trinter. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical Review A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.