Joshua Keene
About
In The Last Decade
Joshua Keene
8 papers receiving 232 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Paleontology 185
- Anthropology 178
- Atmospheric Science 96
- Archeology 53
- Ecology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Joshua Keene
This map shows the geographic impact of Joshua Keene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joshua Keene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joshua Keene more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joshua Keene
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joshua Keene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joshua Keene. The network helps show where Joshua Keene may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joshua Keene
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joshua Keene. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joshua Keene based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joshua Keene. Joshua Keene is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 63 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 150 | |
| 8 | Site Formation Processes at the Buttermilk Creek Site (41BL1239), Bell County, Texas | 3 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.