Joseph W. Vanable

1.9k total citations
35 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Joseph W. Vanable is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Joseph W. Vanable has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Molecular Biology, 24 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 9 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Joseph W. Vanable's work include Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation (18 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (12 papers) and Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (9 papers). Joseph W. Vanable is often cited by papers focused on Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation (18 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (12 papers) and Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (9 papers). Joseph W. Vanable collaborates with scholars based in United States. Joseph W. Vanable's co-authors include L. F. Jaffe, Richard B. Borgens, Lionel F. Jaffe, Lawrence H. Pinto, Drina D. Sta. Iglesia, Kenneth R. Robinson, M.E. McGinnis, Edward J. Cragoe, Nancy J. Mangini and E. J. Cragoe and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Analytical Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Joseph W. Vanable

35 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joseph W. Vanable United States 21 1.2k 669 387 244 168 35 1.6k
K. R. Robinson United States 13 755 0.6× 466 0.7× 369 1.0× 136 0.6× 16 0.1× 21 1.2k
Betty F. Sisken United States 22 425 0.4× 745 1.1× 82 0.2× 177 0.7× 11 0.1× 47 1.4k
David Potter United States 8 400 0.3× 374 0.6× 36 0.1× 69 0.3× 39 0.2× 14 855
Bruce G. Wallace United States 26 1.7k 1.5× 1.6k 2.3× 54 0.1× 97 0.4× 40 0.2× 36 2.5k
Alvaro Sagasti United States 28 974 0.8× 1.0k 1.5× 123 0.3× 53 0.2× 33 0.2× 48 2.7k
Hitoshi Tatsumi Japan 24 1.0k 0.9× 467 0.7× 592 1.5× 263 1.1× 23 0.1× 63 2.4k
Stephen Hollingworth United States 27 2.1k 1.8× 1.3k 1.9× 44 0.1× 680 2.8× 78 0.5× 49 2.9k
Kara L. Marshall United States 17 669 0.6× 273 0.4× 71 0.2× 167 0.7× 60 0.4× 19 1.7k
Rabih Moshourab Germany 13 709 0.6× 417 0.6× 67 0.2× 72 0.3× 39 0.2× 17 1.4k
John P. Reuben United States 18 759 0.6× 552 0.8× 71 0.2× 310 1.3× 13 0.1× 25 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph W. Vanable

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph W. Vanable's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph W. Vanable with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph W. Vanable more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph W. Vanable

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph W. Vanable. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph W. Vanable. The network helps show where Joseph W. Vanable may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph W. Vanable

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph W. Vanable. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph W. Vanable based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph W. Vanable. Joseph W. Vanable is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Iglesia, Drina D. Sta. & Joseph W. Vanable. (1998). Endogenous lateral electric fields around bovine corneal lesions are necessary for and can enhance normal rates of wound healing. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 6(6). 531–542. 66 indexed citations
2.
Iglesia, Drina D. Sta., Edward J. Cragoe, & Joseph W. Vanable. (1996). Electric field strength and epithelization in the newt (Notophthalmus viridescens). Journal of Experimental Zoology. 274(1). 56–62. 21 indexed citations
3.
Robinson, Kenneth R., et al.. (1992). Electrical fields in the vicinity of epithelial wounds in the isolated bovine eye. Experimental Eye Research. 54(6). 999–1003. 118 indexed citations
4.
Cragoe, E. J., et al.. (1991). Intrinsic electric fields promote epithelization of wounds in the newt, Notophthalmus viridescens. Developmental Biology. 146(2). 377–385. 48 indexed citations
5.
Turek, John, et al.. (1990). Wound currents and wound healing in the newt, Notophthalmus viridescens. Development Genes and Evolution. 198(6). 355–362. 6 indexed citations
6.
Pinto, Lawrence H., et al.. (1987). Retinopretectal and accessory optic projections of normal mice and the OKN‐defective mutant mice beige, beige‐J, and pearl. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 258(3). 435–446. 38 indexed citations
7.
McGinnis, M.E. & Joseph W. Vanable. (1986). Wound epithelium resistance controls stump currents. Developmental Biology. 116(1). 174–183. 10 indexed citations
8.
McGinnis, M.E. & Joseph W. Vanable. (1986). Electrical fields in Notophthalmus viridescens limb stumps. Developmental Biology. 116(1). 184–193. 30 indexed citations
9.
Borgens, Richard B., et al.. (1984). Stump currents in regenerating salamanders and newts. Journal of Experimental Zoology. 231(2). 249–256. 35 indexed citations
10.
Balkema, Grant W., et al.. (1984). Visually evoked eye movements in mouse mutants and inbred strains. A screening report.. PubMed. 25(7). 795–800. 35 indexed citations
11.
Jaffe, Lionel F. & Joseph W. Vanable. (1984). Electric fields and wound healing. Clinics in Dermatology. 2(3). 34–44. 131 indexed citations
12.
Borgens, Richard B., Joseph W. Vanable, & Lionel F. Jaffe. (1979). Reduction of sodium dependent stump currents disturbs urodele limb regeneration. Journal of Experimental Zoology. 209(3). 377–386. 48 indexed citations
13.
Borgens, Richard B., Joseph W. Vanable, & Lionel F. Jaffe. (1979). Small artificial currents enhance Xenopus limb regeneration. Journal of Experimental Zoology. 207(2). 217–226. 42 indexed citations
14.
Borgens, Richard B., Joseph W. Vanable, & Lionel F. Jaffe. (1979). Role of subdermal current shunts in the failure of frogs to regenerate. Journal of Experimental Zoology. 209(1). 49–55. 39 indexed citations
15.
Borgens, Richard B., Joseph W. Vanable, & Lionel F. Jaffe. (1979). Bioelectricity and Regeneration. BioScience. 29(8). 468–474. 42 indexed citations
16.
Borgens, Richard B., Joseph W. Vanable, & L. F. Jaffe. (1977). Bioelectricity and regeneration: large currents leave the stumps of regenerating newt limbs.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 74(10). 4528–4532. 148 indexed citations
17.
Pinto, Lawrence H., et al.. (1976). Visually evoked eye movements in the mouse (Mus musculus). Vision Research. 16(10). 1169–IN7. 40 indexed citations
18.
McGarry, Michael P. & Joseph W. Vanable. (1969). The role of thyroxine in the formation of gland rudiments in the skin of Xenopus laevis. Developmental Biology. 20(5). 426–434. 15 indexed citations
19.
McGarry, Michael P. & Joseph W. Vanable. (1969). The role of cell division in Xenopus laevis skin gland development. Developmental Biology. 20(4). 291–303. 15 indexed citations
20.
Vanable, Joseph W.. (1964). Granular gland development during Xenopus laevis metamorphosis. Developmental Biology. 10(3). 331–357. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026