Joseph Smith

137 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Joseph Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Equine 131
  • Hematology 419
  • Small Animals 150
  • Animal Science and Zoology 176
  • Genetics 178
Replace R.W. Kelly with:
R.W. Kelly United Kingdom
John Humphrey Tanzania
K. James United Kingdom
Lewis Thomas United States
Christian Schwabe United States
Wolf‐Bernhard Schill Germany
N Mitchison United Kingdom
William Adler United States
Andrew J. Watson Canada
John D. Stobo United States
Joseph Smith relative to R.W. Kelly United Kingdom R.W. Kelly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
R.W. Kelly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Smith. The network helps show where Joseph Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph Smith Line = papers co-authored together Joseph Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 151 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995296
2 1989278
3 1968158
4 1990117
5 1995113
6 198455
7 198755
8
Certification of polio eradication: process and lessons learned.
200452
9 199251
10 198946
11
Inflammatory response to clostridial vaccines in feedlot cattle.
199443
12 198443
13 200840
14 199440
15
IRON METABOLISM IN CAPTIVE BLACK (DICEROS BICORNIS) AND WHITE (CERATOTHERIUM SIMUM) RHINOCEROSES
199539
16 199438
17 198737
18 199136
19
Programmed cell death in dystrophic (mdx) muscle is inhibited by IGF-II.
199535
20 199234

About Joseph Smith

Joseph Smith is a scholar working on Equine, Hematology, Physiology, Biochemistry and History, having authored 151 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (31 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (14 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (12 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (10 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (10 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (9 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (8 papers) and Blood properties and coagulation (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (131 citations), Hematology (419 citations), Small Animals (150 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (176 citations) and Genetics (178 citations). Joseph Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard W. Wagner, Kazuko Nishikura, Ernest Beutler, Ronald A. Milligan, Michael Whittaker, H. Lee Sweeney, Elizabeth M. Wilson-Kubalek, Gordon A. Andrews, Nicholas Agar and Richard M. DeBowes. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Veterinary Pathology, Research in Veterinary Science and History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026