Joseph Nadglowski

3.1k total citations
31 papers, 544 citations indexed

About

Joseph Nadglowski is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Joseph Nadglowski has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 544 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Pharmacy, 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 9 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Joseph Nadglowski's work include Obesity and Health Practices (25 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (12 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers). Joseph Nadglowski is often cited by papers focused on Obesity and Health Practices (25 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (12 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers). Joseph Nadglowski collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Denmark. Joseph Nadglowski's co-authors include Theodore K. Kyle, Angela Golden, Michelle Look, Boris Stevenin, Ronette L. Kolotkin, Nikhil V. Dhurandhar, Sean M. Phelan, Rebecca M. Puhl, Lee M. Kaplan and Patrick M. O’Neil and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Obesity Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Joseph Nadglowski

30 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joseph Nadglowski United States 10 348 211 150 115 113 31 544
Karen W. Huskey United States 12 302 0.9× 240 1.1× 264 1.8× 136 1.2× 43 0.4× 13 707
Audrina J. Bunton United States 6 226 0.6× 233 1.1× 167 1.1× 77 0.7× 74 0.7× 7 592
Christine Gallagher United States 8 168 0.5× 128 0.6× 95 0.6× 54 0.5× 68 0.6× 16 296
Suzanne Pearson Australia 7 190 0.5× 175 0.8× 143 1.0× 82 0.7× 45 0.4× 10 440
John Denley United Kingdom 5 203 0.6× 202 1.0× 61 0.4× 111 1.0× 30 0.3× 10 376
Nan Lv United States 10 101 0.3× 195 0.9× 46 0.3× 94 0.8× 17 0.2× 14 539
Catherine L. Keating Australia 8 141 0.4× 153 0.7× 202 1.3× 26 0.2× 22 0.2× 12 399
J Hartmann-Boyce United Kingdom 4 111 0.3× 159 0.8× 48 0.3× 107 0.9× 14 0.1× 5 426
Samya Ahmad Al Abdulla Qatar 10 45 0.1× 71 0.3× 84 0.6× 67 0.6× 34 0.3× 37 494
Zainab Akhter United Kingdom 6 69 0.2× 204 1.0× 230 1.5× 29 0.3× 15 0.1× 9 587

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Nadglowski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Nadglowski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Nadglowski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Nadglowski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Nadglowski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Nadglowski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Nadglowski. The network helps show where Joseph Nadglowski may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph Nadglowski

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph Nadglowski. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph Nadglowski based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph Nadglowski. Joseph Nadglowski is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Coleman, Karen J., Robert F. Kushner, Joseph Nadglowski, et al.. (2024). Changes in Healthcare Professionals’ Practice Behaviors Through an Educational Intervention Targeting Weight Bias. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 40(8). 1720–1727. 3 indexed citations
2.
Farrell, E. P., et al.. (2024). Patient perceptions of success in obesity treatment: An IMI2 SOPHIA study. Obesity Science & Practice. 10(4). e70001–e70001. 1 indexed citations
3.
Farrell, E. P., et al.. (2024). “Treated as second class citizens” - the lived experience of obesity-related stigma: an IMI2 SOPHIA study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. 19(1). 2344232–2344232. 1 indexed citations
5.
Farrell, E. P., et al.. (2024). Patient perspectives on personalised medicine for obesity: An IMI2 SOPHIA Study. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice. 18(3). 216–221. 2 indexed citations
6.
Kyle, Theodore K., Scott Kahan, & Joseph Nadglowski. (2023). Language Frames and Shapes the Response to Obesity. Gastroenterology Clinics of North America. 52(4). 761–767. 1 indexed citations
7.
Tahrani, Abd A., Marina Panova‐Noeva, Nanette C. Schloot, et al.. (2023). Stratification of obesity phenotypes to optimize future therapy (SOPHIA). Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 17(10). 1031–1039. 8 indexed citations
8.
Farrell, E. P., et al.. (2022). At home and at risk: The experiences of Irish adults living with obesity during the COVID-19 pandemic. EClinicalMedicine. 51. 101568–101568. 5 indexed citations
9.
Greenway, Frank L., et al.. (2021). COVID-19 and the Urgent Need for New Therapies for Obesity. Population Health Management. 24(5). 531–534. 1 indexed citations
10.
Farrell, E. P., et al.. (2021). The lived experience of people with obesity: study protocol for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. Systematic Reviews. 10(1). 181–181. 1 indexed citations
11.
Hovmand, Peter S., et al.. (2021). Obesity, Biased Mental Models, and Stigma in the Context of the Obesity COVID-19 Syndemic. NAM Perspectives. 2021. 5 indexed citations
13.
Ciemins, Elizabeth L., et al.. (2020). Measuring What Matters: Beyond Quality Performance Measures in Caring for Adults with Obesity. Population Health Management. 24(4). 482–491. 6 indexed citations
14.
Look, Michelle, Ronette L. Kolotkin, Nikhil V. Dhurandhar, et al.. (2019). Implications of differing attitudes and experiences between providers and persons with obesity: results of the national ACTION study. Postgraduate Medicine. 131(5). 357–365. 17 indexed citations
15.
Jinnett, Kimberly, Theodore K. Kyle, Thomas Parry, et al.. (2018). Insights into the Role of Employers Supporting Obesity Management in People with Obesity: Results of the National ACTION Study. Population Health Management. 22(4). 308–314. 4 indexed citations
16.
Lemas, Dominick J., Michelle I. Cardel, Stephanie L. Filipp, et al.. (2018). Objectively measured pediatric obesity prevalence using the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice. 13(1). 12–15. 5 indexed citations
17.
Kyle, Theodore K., Fatima Cody Stanford, & Joseph Nadglowski. (2017). Addressing Weight Stigma and Opening Doors for a Patient‐Centered Approach to Childhood Obesity. Obesity. 26(3). 457–458. 9 indexed citations
18.
Fruh, Sharon, Joseph Nadglowski, Heather R. Hall, et al.. (2016). Obesity Stigma and Bias. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 12(7). 425–432. 77 indexed citations
19.
Nadglowski, Joseph, et al.. (2015). US Employee Wellness Programs and Access to Obesity Treatment in Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance. The American Journal of Managed Care. 21. 1 indexed citations
20.
Nadglowski, Joseph. (2007). Access to Care and Obesity Stigma. Bariatric Nursing and Surgical Patient Care. 2(4). 225–228. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026