Joseph Farrell
- Topics
- Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper)Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Joseph Farrell
2 papers receiving 3 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 8
- Anthropology 4
- Organic Chemistry 3
- Literature and Literary Theory 3
- Classics 2
- Archeology 2
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Farrell
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Farrell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Farrell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Farrell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Farrell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Farrell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Farrell. The network helps show where Joseph Farrell may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 |
About Joseph Farrell
Joseph Farrell is a scholar working on Anthropology, Philosophy and Infectious Diseases, having authored 2 papers that have together received 7 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (2 citations), Anthropology (4 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (3 citations). Their work appears in journals such as Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.