Joseph Chipperfield

615 total citations
17 papers, 374 citations indexed

About

Joseph Chipperfield is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, Joseph Chipperfield has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 374 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Ecology, 5 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 5 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in Joseph Chipperfield's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers). Joseph Chipperfield is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers). Joseph Chipperfield collaborates with scholars based in Norway, United States and United Kingdom. Joseph Chipperfield's co-authors include Pierre Dupont, Cyril Milleret, Richard Bischof, Ben L. Phillips, Michael Kearney, J. Andrew Royle, Chris D. Thomas, Thomas Hovestadt, Calvin Dytham and Brian Huntley and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Joseph Chipperfield

16 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joseph Chipperfield Norway 11 239 143 96 69 68 17 374
João Fabrício Mota Rodrigues Brazil 13 147 0.6× 145 1.0× 148 1.5× 82 1.2× 133 2.0× 37 384
Laxman Khanal Nepal 10 166 0.7× 121 0.8× 67 0.7× 50 0.7× 30 0.4× 60 350
Luke C. Evans United Kingdom 10 75 0.3× 79 0.6× 69 0.7× 119 1.7× 61 0.9× 22 298
Cynthia Hartway United States 8 250 1.0× 61 0.4× 131 1.4× 74 1.1× 53 0.8× 10 340
David Romero Spain 11 125 0.5× 113 0.8× 94 1.0× 52 0.8× 49 0.7× 28 289
Júlia Emi de Faria Oshima Brazil 11 232 1.0× 57 0.4× 95 1.0× 72 1.0× 90 1.3× 22 366
José Carlos Guerrero Spain 12 239 1.0× 135 0.9× 157 1.6× 86 1.2× 55 0.8× 38 426
Lucile Marescot France 9 145 0.6× 51 0.4× 105 1.1× 80 1.2× 51 0.8× 13 310
E. Hance Ellington United States 13 351 1.5× 83 0.6× 67 0.7× 70 1.0× 54 0.8× 22 464
Jennyffer Cruz New Zealand 15 323 1.4× 78 0.5× 80 0.8× 48 0.7× 62 0.9× 35 410

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Chipperfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Chipperfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Chipperfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Chipperfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Chipperfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Chipperfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Chipperfield. The network helps show where Joseph Chipperfield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph Chipperfield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph Chipperfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph Chipperfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph Chipperfield. Joseph Chipperfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Nielsen, Anders, et al.. (2025). Solitary bees reduce pollination and production deficits in apple cultivation. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 388. 109670–109670.
2.
Chipperfield, Joseph, Janine Illian, Pierre Dupont, et al.. (2022). A flexible and efficientBayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture–recapture data. Ecology. 104(1). e3887–e3887. 10 indexed citations
3.
Venter, Zander S., Trond Reitan, Claus Rasmussen, et al.. (2021). MetaComNet: A random forest‐based framework for making spatial predictions of plant–pollinator interactions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 13(2). 500–513. 9 indexed citations
4.
Bischof, Richard, Cyril Milleret, Pierre Dupont, et al.. (2020). Estimating and forecasting spatial population dynamics of apex predators using transnational genetic monitoring. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117(48). 30531–30538. 81 indexed citations
5.
Milleret, Cyril, Pierre Dupont, Joseph Chipperfield, et al.. (2020). Estimating abundance with interruptions in data collection using open population spatial capture–recapture models. Ecosphere. 11(7). 13 indexed citations
6.
Contina, Andrea, Michael B. Wunder, Andreas M. Neophytou, et al.. (2020). Comment on “A global-scale ecological niche model to predict SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection rate”, author Coro. Ecological Modelling. 436. 109288–109288. 2 indexed citations
7.
Carlson, Colin J., Joseph Chipperfield, Blas M. Benito, Richard J. Telford, & Robert B. O’Hara. (2020). Species distribution models are inappropriate for COVID-19. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 4(6). 770–771. 30 indexed citations
8.
Bischof, Richard, Pierre Dupont, Cyril Milleret, Joseph Chipperfield, & J. Andrew Royle. (2020). Consequences of ignoring group association in spatial capture–recapture analysis. Wildlife Biology. 2020(1). 42 indexed citations
9.
Bischof, Richard, Cyril Milleret, Pierre Dupont, et al.. (2019). RovQuant : estimating density, abundance and population dynamics of bears, wolverines and wolves in Scandinavia. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo). 4 indexed citations
10.
Bischof, Richard, Cyril Milleret, Pierre Dupont, et al.. (2019). Estimating the size of the Scandinavian wolf population with spatial capture-recapture and conversion factors. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo). 2 indexed citations
11.
Telford, Richard J., Joseph Chipperfield, Hilary H. Birks, & H. J. B. Birks. (2016). How foreign is the past?. Nature. 538(7626). E1–E2. 3 indexed citations
12.
Heegaard, Einar, et al.. (2016). Species trait selection along a prescribed fire chronosequence. Insect Conservation and Diversity. 9(5). 446–455. 22 indexed citations
13.
Wheeler, Helen C., Joseph Chipperfield, Carl A. Roland, & Jens‐Christian Svenning. (2015). How will the greening of the Arctic affect an important prey species and disturbance agent? Vegetation effects on arctic ground squirrels. Oecologia. 178(3). 915–929. 10 indexed citations
14.
Gillingham, Phillipa K., Stephen C. F. Palmer, Brian Huntley, et al.. (2012). The relative importance of climate and habitat in determining the distributions of species at different spatial scales: a case study with ground beetles in Great Britain. Ecography. 35(9). 831–838. 55 indexed citations
15.
Chipperfield, Joseph, Calvin Dytham, & Thomas Hovestadt. (2011). An Updated Algorithm for the Generation of Neutral Landscapes by Spectral Synthesis. PLoS ONE. 6(2). e17040–e17040. 22 indexed citations
16.
Chipperfield, Joseph, E. Penelope Holland, Calvin Dytham, Chris D. Thomas, & Thomas Hovestadt. (2011). On the approximation of continuous dispersal kernels in discrete‐space models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2(6). 668–681. 19 indexed citations
17.
Phillips, Ben L., Joseph Chipperfield, & Michael Kearney. (2008). The toad ahead: challenges of modelling the range and spread of an invasive species. Wildlife Research. 35(3). 222–234. 50 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026