Joseph C. McAuliffe
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 10%
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Co-authors
- A.J. PouloseRobert DiCosimoOle HindsgaulMinoru FukudaMinoru UjitaRajesh R. NaikRichard A. VaiaChristopher J L Murray
- Topics
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (18 papers)Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (14 papers)Enzyme Production and Characterization (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Joseph C. McAuliffe
30 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Organic Chemistry 449
- Biomedical Engineering 430
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 367
- Biotechnology 254
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph C. McAuliffe
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph C. McAuliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph C. McAuliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph C. McAuliffe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph C. McAuliffe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph C. McAuliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph C. McAuliffe. The network helps show where Joseph C. McAuliffe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph C. McAuliffe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph C. McAuliffe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph C. McAuliffe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph C. McAuliffe. Joseph C. McAuliffe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41 | |
| 2 | Industrial use of immobilized enzymesbreakdown → | 1054 |
| 3 | 162 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 182 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 93 | |
| 9 | 47 | |
| 10 | 95 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 75 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Joseph C. McAuliffe
Joseph C. McAuliffe is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (18 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (14 papers) and Enzyme Production and Characterization (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (254 citations), Molecular Biology (1.6k citations) and Biomaterials (248 citations). Joseph C. McAuliffe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include A.J. Poulose, Robert DiCosimo, Ole Hindsgaul, Minoru Fukuda, Minoru Ujita, Rajesh R. Naik, Richard A. Vaia, Christopher J L Murray, Morley O. Stone and Sharon E. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Society Reviews, Advanced Materials and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.