Jordane Boudesseul
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Sociology and Political Science
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Laurent BègueOulmann ZerhouniValentin FlaudiasGeorges BrousseI. de ChazeronSébastien GuillaumeLudovic SamalinMickaël Naassïla
- Topics
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers)COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers)
- Journals
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsPersonality and Social Psychology BulletinJournal of Medical Internet Research
- Partner nations
- FrancePeruUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jordane Boudesseul
15 papers receiving 264 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Clinical Psychology 160
- Social Psychology 59
- General Health Professions 44
- Sociology and Political Science 41
- Cognitive Neuroscience 38
Countries citing papers authored by Jordane Boudesseul
This map shows the geographic impact of Jordane Boudesseul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jordane Boudesseul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jordane Boudesseul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jordane Boudesseul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jordane Boudesseul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jordane Boudesseul. The network helps show where Jordane Boudesseul may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jordane Boudesseul
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jordane Boudesseul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jordane Boudesseul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jordane Boudesseul. Jordane Boudesseul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 139 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 30 |
About Jordane Boudesseul
Jordane Boudesseul is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (160 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations) and Social Psychology (59 citations). Jordane Boudesseul has collaborated with scholars based in France, Peru and United States. Frequent co-authors include Laurent Bègue, Oulmann Zerhouni, Valentin Flaudias, Georges Brousse, I. de Chazeron, Sébastien Guillaume, Ludovic Samalin, Mickaël Naassïla, Lucía Romo and Florián Cova. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.