Joost Verburg

1.8k total citations
37 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Joost Verburg is a scholar working on Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Joost Verburg has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Radiation, 26 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 19 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Joost Verburg's work include Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (26 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (17 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (14 papers). Joost Verburg is often cited by papers focused on Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (26 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (17 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (14 papers). Joost Verburg collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Joost Verburg's co-authors include Joao Seco, Harald Paganetti, Thomas Bortfeld, Lars Gjesteby, Yannan Jin, D Giantsoudi, Ge Wang, Bruno De Man, Brian Winey and Helen A. Shih and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, IEEE Access and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

In The Last Decade

Joost Verburg

36 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Joost Verburg
F DeBlois Canada
S. Russo Italy
W Kilby United Kingdom
Tanya Kairn Australia
Arnold R. Cowen United Kingdom
Anthony Butler New Zealand
M. Fatyga United States
Sairos Safai Switzerland
F DeBlois Canada
Joost Verburg
Citations per year, relative to Joost Verburg Joost Verburg (= 1×) peers F DeBlois

Countries citing papers authored by Joost Verburg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joost Verburg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joost Verburg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joost Verburg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joost Verburg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joost Verburg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joost Verburg. The network helps show where Joost Verburg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joost Verburg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joost Verburg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joost Verburg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joost Verburg. Joost Verburg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hueso-González, F., Jonathan Berthold, Patrick Wohlfahrt, et al.. (2024). Inter-center comparison of proton range verification prototypes with an anthropomorphic head phantom. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 69(22). 225010–225010. 2 indexed citations
2.
Daartz, Juliane, Arthur Lalonde, E Cascio, et al.. (2024). Voxel-wise dose rate calculation in clinical pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 69(6). 65003–65003. 4 indexed citations
3.
Lalonde, Arthur, Konrad P. Nesteruk, Hoyeon Lee, et al.. (2023). Large anatomical changes in head-and-neck cancers – A dosimetric comparison of online and offline adaptive proton therapy. Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology. 40. 100625–100625. 17 indexed citations
4.
Scholey, Jessica, Evangelia Kaza, Thomas Benkert, et al.. (2023). Validation of an MR-based multimodal method for molecular composition and proton stopping power ratio determination using ex vivo animal tissues and tissue-mimicking phantoms. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 68(17). 175033–175033. 2 indexed citations
5.
Bortfeld, Thomas, et al.. (2022). Validation of prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy for proton range verification in tissue-mimicking and porcine samples. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 67(20). 205006–205006. 7 indexed citations
6.
Lee, Hoyeon, Jungwook Shin, Joost Verburg, et al.. (2022). MOQUI: an open-source GPU-based Monte Carlo code for proton dose calculation with efficient data structure. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 67(17). 174001–174001. 15 indexed citations
7.
Lalonde, Arthur, G Sharp, Clemens Grassberger, et al.. (2021). Comparison of weekly and daily online adaptation for head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 66(5). 55023–55023. 45 indexed citations
8.
Lalonde, Arthur, Brian Winey, Joost Verburg, Harald Paganetti, & G Sharp. (2020). Evaluation of CBCT scatter correction using deep convolutional neural networks for head and neck adaptive proton therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 65(24). 245022–245022. 61 indexed citations
9.
Hueso-González, F., et al.. (2018). A full-scale clinical prototype for proton range verification using prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 63(18). 185019–185019. 131 indexed citations
10.
Giantsoudi, D, Bruno De Man, Joost Verburg, et al.. (2017). Metal artifacts in computed tomography for radiation therapy planning: dosimetric effects and impact of metal artifact reduction. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 62(8). R49–R80. 119 indexed citations
11.
Verburg, Joost, Clemens Grassberger, S Dowdell, et al.. (2015). Automated Monte Carlo Simulation of Proton Therapy Treatment Plans. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment. 15(6). NP35–NP46. 27 indexed citations
12.
Testa, Mauro, et al.. (2014). Range verification of passively scattered proton beams based on prompt gamma time patterns. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 59(15). 4181–4195. 34 indexed citations
13.
Verburg, Joost & Joao Seco. (2014). Proton range verification through prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 59(23). 7089–7106. 157 indexed citations
14.
Testa, Mauro, Joost Verburg, M Rose, et al.. (2013). Proton radiography and proton computed tomography based on time-resolved dose measurements. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 58(22). 8215–8233. 54 indexed citations
15.
Verburg, Joost & Joao Seco. (2013). Dosimetric accuracy of proton therapy for chordoma patients with titanium implants. Medical Physics. 40(7). 71727–71727. 42 indexed citations
16.
Verburg, Joost, Kent J. Riley, Thomas Bortfeld, & Joao Seco. (2013). Energy- and time-resolved detection of prompt gamma-rays for proton range verification. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 58(20). L37–L49. 96 indexed citations
17.
Verburg, Joost, Helen A. Shih, & Joao Seco. (2012). Simulation of prompt gamma-ray emission during proton radiotherapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 57(17). 5459–5472. 79 indexed citations
18.
Schuemann, Jan, Jungwook Shin, Joseph Perl, et al.. (2012). SU‐E‐T‐500: Pencil‐Beam versus Monte Carlo Based Dose Calculation for Proton Therapy Patients with Complex Geometries. Clinical Use of the TOPAS Monte Carlo System. Medical Physics. 39(6Part18). 3820–3820. 3 indexed citations
19.
Verburg, Joost & Joao Seco. (2012). CT metal artifact reduction method correcting for beam hardening and missing projections. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 57(9). 2803–2818. 103 indexed citations
20.
Blok, H.P., et al.. (1975). Investigation of 89Y and 87Rb by (p, p′) reactions. Nuclear Physics A. 251(2). 269–288. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026