Joos Droogleever Fortuijn

719 total citations
31 papers, 526 citations indexed

About

Joos Droogleever Fortuijn is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Demography. According to data from OpenAlex, Joos Droogleever Fortuijn has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 526 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 9 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 9 papers in Demography. Recurrent topics in Joos Droogleever Fortuijn's work include Rural development and sustainability (9 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (8 papers) and Geography Education and Pedagogy (8 papers). Joos Droogleever Fortuijn is often cited by papers focused on Rural development and sustainability (9 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (8 papers) and Geography Education and Pedagogy (8 papers). Joos Droogleever Fortuijn collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Joos Droogleever Fortuijn's co-authors include Frans Thissen, Dirk Strijker, Tialda Haartsen, Janice Monk, S. Musterd, Wim Ostendorf, Fenne M. Pinkster, Clionadh Raleigh, Ifan D. H. Shepherd and Clara H. Mulder and has published in prestigious journals such as Urban Studies, Journal of Rural Studies and GeoJournal.

In The Last Decade

Joos Droogleever Fortuijn

29 papers receiving 480 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joos Droogleever Fortuijn Netherlands 14 275 141 136 88 69 31 526
Fenne M. Pinkster Netherlands 14 407 1.5× 53 0.4× 29 0.2× 20 0.2× 31 0.4× 20 561
Dušan Drbohlav Czechia 10 207 0.8× 79 0.6× 17 0.1× 20 0.2× 18 0.3× 58 393
Christopher Harker United Kingdom 13 391 1.4× 33 0.2× 33 0.2× 98 1.1× 38 0.6× 25 580
Garry Robson United Kingdom 6 347 1.3× 33 0.2× 65 0.5× 9 0.1× 57 0.8× 8 590
Eleanor Jupp United Kingdom 13 260 0.9× 27 0.2× 32 0.2× 44 0.5× 58 0.8× 22 426
Aneta Piekut United Kingdom 12 299 1.1× 39 0.3× 16 0.1× 17 0.2× 28 0.4× 29 407
Silvia Marcu Spain 11 246 0.9× 124 0.9× 16 0.1× 22 0.3× 46 0.7× 58 373
Robert C. Mings United States 12 342 1.2× 212 1.5× 39 0.3× 35 0.4× 10 0.1× 26 467
Inés M. Miyares United States 11 482 1.8× 163 1.2× 12 0.1× 45 0.5× 45 0.7× 17 572
Nancy Hiemstra United States 13 634 2.3× 66 0.5× 19 0.1× 46 0.5× 18 0.3× 25 720

Countries citing papers authored by Joos Droogleever Fortuijn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joos Droogleever Fortuijn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joos Droogleever Fortuijn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joos Droogleever Fortuijn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joos Droogleever Fortuijn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joos Droogleever Fortuijn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joos Droogleever Fortuijn. The network helps show where Joos Droogleever Fortuijn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joos Droogleever Fortuijn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joos Droogleever Fortuijn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joos Droogleever Fortuijn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joos Droogleever Fortuijn. Joos Droogleever Fortuijn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fortuijn, Joos Droogleever. (2019). Gender and geography in the Netherlands: from separation to integration. Gender Place & Culture. 26(7-9). 1297–1303. 1 indexed citations
2.
Huang, Shirlena, Janice Monk, Joos Droogleever Fortuijn, Maria Dolors García Ramón, & Janet Henshall Momsen. (2017). A continuing agenda for gender: the role of the IGU Commission on gender and geography. Gender Place & Culture. 24(7). 919–938. 9 indexed citations
3.
Musterd, S., et al.. (2014). ‘Ageing in place’: experiences of older adults in Amsterdam and Portland. GeoJournal. 81(2). 197–209. 31 indexed citations
4.
Thissen, Frans & Joos Droogleever Fortuijn. (2012). Het dorpshuis: van bewoners en voor bewoners: de maatschappelijke participatie van dorpsbewoners en de betekenis van het dorpshuis in de dorpen van Littenseradiel. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 1 indexed citations
5.
Fortuijn, Joos Droogleever. (2011). Teaching gender and geography: the case of the Netherlands. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. 20(3). 175–178. 3 indexed citations
6.
Hoven, Bettina van, et al.. (2010). Teaching feminist geographies in the Netherlands. Learning from student-led fieldtrips. Documents d Anàlisi Geogràfica. 56(2). 305–321. 5 indexed citations
7.
Hoven, Bettina van, et al.. (2009). Teaching Gender, diversity and urban space. An intersectional approach between Gender studies and Spatial disciplines. 2 indexed citations
8.
Fortuijn, Joos Droogleever. (2009). Gender-sensitive observations in public spaces as a teaching tool. Geographica Helvetica. 64(1). 37–44.
9.
Pinkster, Fenne M. & Joos Droogleever Fortuijn. (2009). Watch out for the neighborhood trap! A case study on parental perceptions of and strategies to counter risks for children in a disadvantaged neighborhood. Children s Geographies. 7(3). 323–337. 30 indexed citations
10.
Meer, M. van der, et al.. (2008). De sociale draagkracht van dorpen in Borsele: Leefbaarheid, sociale cohesie en community care in kleine dorpen. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 1 indexed citations
11.
Fortuijn, Joos Droogleever, Vanessa Burholt, Dieter Ferring, et al.. (2006). The activity patterns of older adults: a cross‐sectional study in six European countries. Population Space and Place. 12(5). 353–369. 33 indexed citations
12.
Monk, Janice, Joos Droogleever Fortuijn, & Clionadh Raleigh. (2004). The representation of women in academic Geography: contexts, climate and curricula. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 28(1). 83–90. 32 indexed citations
13.
Fortuijn, Joos Droogleever, et al.. (2004). ?Gendered spaces? in urban and rural contexts: An introduction. GeoJournal. 61(3). 215–217. 5 indexed citations
14.
Fortuijn, Joos Droogleever & Wim Ostendorf. (2004). Gender and urban poverty: Single mothers in Amsterdam. GeoJournal. 61(3). 239–246. 14 indexed citations
15.
Fortuijn, Joos Droogleever, et al.. (2003). Stad en land : over bewoners en woonmilieus. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 5 indexed citations
16.
Fortuijn, Joos Droogleever. (2002). Internationalising Learning and Teaching: A European experience. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 26(3). 263–273. 40 indexed citations
17.
Shepherd, Ifan D. H., Janice Monk, & Joos Droogleever Fortuijn. (2000). Internationalising Geography in Higher Education: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 24(2). 285–298. 30 indexed citations
18.
Fortuijn, Joos Droogleever. (1999). Daily life of elderly women in a rural area in The Netherlands. GeoJournal. 48(3). 187–193. 5 indexed citations
19.
Fortuijn, Joos Droogleever, S. Musterd, & Wim Ostendorf. (1998). International Migration and Ethnic Segregation: Impacts on Urban Areas-Introduction. Urban Studies. 35(3). 367–370. 29 indexed citations
20.
Fortuijn, Joos Droogleever. (1995). Les dones en entorns urbans i suburbans. Documents d Anàlisi Geogràfica. 83–95.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026