Joop Ouborg

477 total citations
9 papers, 309 citations indexed

About

Joop Ouborg is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Joop Ouborg has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 309 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 3 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Joop Ouborg's work include Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (2 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers). Joop Ouborg is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (2 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers). Joop Ouborg collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Mexico and Austria. Joop Ouborg's co-authors include Philippine Vergeer, Niels Wagemaker, Francesco Angeloni, G. van der Velde, Brigitta I. van Tussenbroek, Thomas P. van Gurp, Koen J. F. Verhoeven, Henk Schat, Michelle Waycott and Ole Madsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Methods, New Phytologist and Oecologia.

In The Last Decade

Joop Ouborg

8 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Joop Ouborg Netherlands	8	122	94	89	86	83	9	309
Suchitra Changtragoon Thailand	11	126 1.0×	142 1.5×	60 0.7×	136 1.6×	52 0.6×	24	323
Thiago G. Lima United States	9	118 1.0×	161 1.7×	35 0.4×	114 1.3×	59 0.7×	14	332
Jose L. Mijangos Australia	5	106 0.9×	155 1.6×	53 0.6×	42 0.5×	74 0.9×	6	274
Wuxia Guo China	14	239 2.0×	126 1.3×	164 1.8×	218 2.5×	70 0.8×	36	471
María Belén Arias United Kingdom	9	207 1.7×	49 0.5×	68 0.8×	99 1.2×	45 0.5×	20	377
Tarcila de Lima Nadia Brazil	9	73 0.6×	49 0.5×	125 1.4×	47 0.5×	141 1.7×	18	246
Ivania Cerón‐Souza Colombia	10	192 1.6×	141 1.5×	68 0.8×	94 1.1×	42 0.5×	23	296
Henrik Christiansen Belgium	11	129 1.1×	34 0.4×	30 0.3×	135 1.6×	46 0.6×	28	298
J. Sadowski United States	7	98 0.8×	41 0.4×	166 1.9×	124 1.4×	72 0.9×	10	348
Chika Mitsuyuki Japan	5	57 0.5×	61 0.6×	40 0.4×	67 0.8×	73 0.9×	11	183

Countries citing papers authored by Joop Ouborg

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joop Ouborg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joop Ouborg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joop Ouborg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joop Ouborg

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joop Ouborg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joop Ouborg. The network helps show where Joop Ouborg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joop Ouborg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joop Ouborg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joop Ouborg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joop Ouborg. Joop Ouborg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Latzel, Vít, Markus Fischer, Ruben Gutzat, et al.. (2022). Parental environmental effects are common and strong, but unpredictable, in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytologist. 237(3). 1014–1023. 9 indexed citations

2.

Gurp, Thomas P. van, et al.. (2016). epiGBS: reference-free reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Nature Methods. 13(4). 322–324. 86 indexed citations

3.

Angeloni, Francesco, Niels Wagemaker, Philippine Vergeer, & Joop Ouborg. (2011). Genomic toolboxes for conservation biologists. Evolutionary Applications. 5(2). 130–143. 72 indexed citations

4.

Groenendael, Jan van, et al.. (2009). Phylogenetic analyses of the leaf beetle genus Galerucella: Evidence for host switching at speciation?. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 53(2). 361–367. 10 indexed citations

5.

Tussenbroek, Brigitta I. van, et al.. (2009). High levels of gene flow and low population genetic structure related to high dispersal potential of a tropical marine angiosperm. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 390. 67–77. 57 indexed citations

6.

Ouborg, Joop. (2009). Two‐way communication between genomics and society. EMBO Reports. 10(5). 420–423.

7.

Dijk, Jent Kornelis van, Michelle Waycott, Brigitta I. van Tussenbroek, & Joop Ouborg. (2006). Polymorphic microsatellite markers for the Caribbean seagrassThalassia testudinumBanks ex König. Molecular Ecology Notes. 7(1). 89–91. 11 indexed citations

8.

Velde, G. van der, et al.. (2002). Host preference and larval performance suggest host race formation in Galerucella nymphaeae. Oecologia. 130(3). 433–440. 44 indexed citations

9.

Schat, Henk, et al.. (1989). Life history and plant architecture: size-dependent reproductive allocation in annual and biennialCentauriumspecies. Acta Botanica Neerlandica. 38(2). 183–201. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact