Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Audit Office Size, Audit Quality, and Audit Pricing
2010447 citationsJong‐Hag Choi, Chansog Kim et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jong‐Hag Choi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jong‐Hag Choi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jong‐Hag Choi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jong‐Hag Choi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jong‐Hag Choi. The network helps show where Jong‐Hag Choi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jong‐Hag Choi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jong‐Hag Choi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jong‐Hag Choi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jong‐Hag Choi. Jong‐Hag Choi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Choi, Jong‐Hag, et al.. (2018). Opinion Shopping to Avoid a Going Concern Audit Opinion and Subsequent Audit Quality. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
2.
Choi, Jong‐Hag, et al.. (2016). The Association between Audit Quality after the Auditor Change and Audit Fee Low-balling: The Differences between Mandatory Auditor Change Firms and Voluntary Auditor Change Firms. Korean Accounting Review. 41(2). 131–165.3 indexed citations
3.
Choi, Jong‐Hag, et al.. (2015). SK Global’s Accounting Fraud and Audit Failure. Korean Accounting Journal. 24(4). 249–281.1 indexed citations
4.
Song, Bomi, et al.. (2014). The Effect of the Level of Competition in Audit Market on Audit Quality and Audit Fees. korean management review. 43(5). 1529–1556.2 indexed citations
Kwon, Soo Young, et al.. (2013). Critical review on the determinants and economic consequences of audit quality. Korean Accounting Review. 38(2). 447–523.1 indexed citations
Choi, Jong‐Hag, et al.. (2011). The Effect of Corporate Governance on Human Resource Investment in Internal Control. Korean Accounting Journal. 20(5). 1–33.1 indexed citations
Choi, Jong‐Hag, et al.. (2010). The Effect of the Wedge between Voting Right and Cash Flow Right on Error in Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts. Korean Accounting Review. 35(2). 1–34.3 indexed citations
11.
Park, Jong‐Il, et al.. (2009). The Role of Large Auditors in Restricting the Earnings Management by Largest Shareholders' and Foreign Investors' Ownership. 27(1). 201–229.5 indexed citations
12.
Choi, Jong‐Hag, et al.. (2009). What determines Audit Quality of Consolidated Financial Statements. korean management review. 38(6). 1659–1690.2 indexed citations
13.
Choi, Jong‐Hag, et al.. (2009). The Internal versus External CEO Changes, The Reason for the Changes, and Earnings Management. Korean Accounting Review. 34(2). 45–78.3 indexed citations
Choi, Jong‐Hag, et al.. (2008). The Association between Abnormal Audit and Non-Audit Fees and Conservatism of Client Firms. Korean Accounting Review. 33(4). 175–210.1 indexed citations
Choi, Jong‐Hag & Yoonseok Zang. (2006). Implication of Comprehensive Income Disclosure for Future Earnings and Analysts' Forecasts. Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University). 12(2). 77.16 indexed citations
19.
Choi, Jong‐Hag, et al.. (2005). Does Economic Fee Dependence on a Client Impair Auditor Independence. Korean Accounting Review. 30(1). 121–154.2 indexed citations
20.
Choi, Jong‐Hag, et al.. (2004). the relationship between new audit committee establishment and earnings management. Korean Accounting Review. 29(1). 143–178.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.