Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Wallace
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Wallace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Wallace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Wallace more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Wallace
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Wallace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Wallace. The network helps show where Jonathan Wallace may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Wallace
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Wallace.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Wallace based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Wallace. Jonathan Wallace is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Grobelnik, Marko, et al.. (2018). Mining Medline for the Visualisation of a Global Perspective on Biomedical Knowledge. Open Research Online (The Open University).1 indexed citations
Zheng, Huiru, Hui‐Yu Wang, Maurice Mulvenna, et al.. (2012). PAViS: Pattern Analysis and Visualization System for Sleep Monitoring in Ambient Assisted Living. 4(1). 320–332.1 indexed citations
10.
Mulvenna, Maurice, et al.. (2012). Innovation of eParticipation Strategies Using Living Labs as Intermediaries. Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University). 10(2). 120–132.12 indexed citations
Mulvenna, Maurice, Birgitta Bergvall‐Kåreborn, Jonathan Wallace, Brendan Galbraith, & Suzanne Martin. (2010). Living labs as engagement models for innovation. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 1–11.12 indexed citations
14.
Zheng, Huiru, Suzanne Martin, Maurice Mulvenna, et al.. (2009). NOCTURNAL: Night Optimised Care Technology for Users Needing Assisted Lifestyles.2 indexed citations
15.
Wallace, Jonathan, et al.. (2004). Doing business with Jordan. Kogan Page eBooks.3 indexed citations
16.
Wallace, Jonathan, et al.. (2002). Doing business with Libya. Kogan Page eBooks.4 indexed citations
17.
Wallace, Jonathan, et al.. (1996). Java Basics: Programming.
18.
Wallace, Jonathan. (1983). Motives and emotions in a general learning system. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 84–86.3 indexed citations
19.
Wallace, Jonathan. (1982). A Developmental Approach to General Learning Processes.. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 165–170.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.