Jonathan Parker

2.0k total citations
42 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Jonathan Parker is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Parker has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 9 papers in Spectroscopy and 5 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Parker's work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (35 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (17 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (16 papers). Jonathan Parker is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (35 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (17 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (16 papers). Jonathan Parker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Jonathan Parker's co-authors include K T Taylor, C. R. Stroud, Edward S Smyth, L R Moore, Daniel Dundas, B. Doherty, K. T. Taylor, K. D. Schultz, Louis F. DiMauro and Cosmin I. Blaga and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A and Optics Express.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Parker

41 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Parker United Kingdom 22 1.5k 555 241 115 80 42 1.6k
Martin Dörr Belgium 23 1.4k 0.9× 269 0.5× 322 1.3× 137 1.2× 86 1.1× 39 1.4k
M. G. Schätzel Germany 7 903 0.6× 357 0.6× 203 0.8× 70 0.6× 32 0.4× 7 928
C. Figueira de Morisson Faria United Kingdom 27 1.9k 1.3× 782 1.4× 433 1.8× 137 1.2× 69 0.9× 76 2.0k
D. G. Arbó Argentina 18 1.4k 0.9× 585 1.1× 303 1.3× 90 0.8× 67 0.8× 53 1.4k
M. Protopapas United Kingdom 11 1.1k 0.7× 198 0.4× 354 1.5× 125 1.1× 42 0.5× 12 1.1k
K. Zrost Germany 18 1.6k 1.0× 870 1.6× 286 1.2× 128 1.1× 26 0.3× 22 1.6k
Difa Ye China 16 951 0.6× 412 0.7× 141 0.6× 64 0.6× 59 0.7× 50 964
S. Eckart Germany 17 930 0.6× 322 0.6× 144 0.6× 33 0.3× 41 0.5× 40 977
G. Lagmago Kamta Canada 16 1.3k 0.8× 453 0.8× 116 0.5× 46 0.4× 44 0.6× 30 1.3k
F. Lindner Germany 9 680 0.4× 263 0.5× 173 0.7× 67 0.6× 15 0.2× 12 720

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Parker. The network helps show where Jonathan Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Parker. Jonathan Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bethard, Steven & Jonathan Parker. (2016). A Semantically Compositional Annotation Scheme for Time Normalization. Language Resources and Evaluation. 3779–3786. 16 indexed citations
2.
Armstrong, Gregory, Jonathan Parker, & K T Taylor. (2012). Double-electron above-threshold ionization resonances as interference phenomena. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 388(3). 32057–32057. 1 indexed citations
3.
Moore, L R, Michael Lysaght, L. A. A. Nikolopoulos, et al.. (2011). The RMT method for many-electron atomic systems in intense short-pulse laser light. Journal of Modern Optics. 58(13). 1132–1140. 71 indexed citations
4.
Armstrong, Gregory, Jonathan Parker, & K T Taylor. (2011). Double-electron above-threshold ionization resonances as interference phenomena. New Journal of Physics. 13(1). 13024–13024. 14 indexed citations
5.
Parker, Jonathan. (2010). A Kantian Critique of Positive Aesthetics of Nature. 2(2).
6.
Parker, Jonathan, et al.. (2007). Single-ionization of helium at Ti:Sapphire wavelengths: rates and scaling laws. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 40(10). 1729–1743. 22 indexed citations
7.
Taylor, K T, et al.. (2007). Theory of laser-driven double-ionization of atoms at Ti:sapphire laser wavelengths. Journal of Modern Optics. 54(13-15). 1959–1983. 14 indexed citations
8.
Parker, Jonathan, B. Doherty, K. T. Taylor, et al.. (2006). High-Energy Cutoff in the Spectrum of Strong-Field Nonsequential Double Ionization. Physical Review Letters. 96(13). 133001–133001. 231 indexed citations
9.
Taylor, K T, et al.. (2005). Multiphoton double ionization of atoms and molecules by FEL XUV light. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena. 144-147. 1191–1196. 7 indexed citations
10.
Parker, Jonathan, et al.. (2005). Beyond the dipole approximation for helium and hydrogen in intense laser fields. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 38(3). 237–254. 24 indexed citations
11.
Parker, Jonathan, L R Moore, & K T Taylor. (2001). Accurate computational methods for two-electron atom-laser interactions. Optics Express. 8(7). 436–436. 11 indexed citations
12.
Taylor, K. T., et al.. (1999). Weakly and strongly bound electronic motion in a laser field. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 32(12). 3015–3036. 4 indexed citations
13.
Dundas, Daniel, K T Taylor, Jonathan Parker, & Edward S Smyth. (1999). Double-ionization dynamics of laser-driven helium. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 32(9). L231–L238. 67 indexed citations
14.
Parker, Jonathan, Edward S Smyth, & K T Taylor. (1998). Intense-field multiphoton ionization of helium. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 31(14). L571–L578. 55 indexed citations
15.
Taylor, K. T., et al.. (1998). Angular momentum in a laser-driven atom. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 31(18). L711–L718. 2 indexed citations
16.
Smyth, Edward S, Jonathan Parker, & K T Taylor. (1998). Numerical integration of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for laser-driven helium. Computer Physics Communications. 114(1-3). 1–14. 132 indexed citations
17.
Parker, Jonathan & K T Taylor. (1995). Parallelized implicit propagators for the finite-difference Schrödinger equation. Computer Physics Communications. 88(2-3). 217–228. 1 indexed citations
18.
Parker, Jonathan & C. R. Stroud. (1989). Generalization of the Keldysh theory of above-threshold ionization for the case of femtosecond pulses. Physical review. A, General physics. 40(10). 5651–5658. 23 indexed citations
19.
Parker, Jonathan & C. R. Stroud. (1987). Transient theory of cavity-modified spontaneous emission. Physical review. A, General physics. 35(10). 4226–4237. 32 indexed citations
20.
Parker, Jonathan & C. R. Stroud. (1986). Rydberg Wave Packets and the Classical Limit. Physica Scripta. T12. 70–75. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026