Jonathan Mercer

2.7k citations
19 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Mercer

18 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jonathan Mercer
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Political Science and International Relations 781
  • Development 77
  • General Decision Sciences 39
  • Sociology and Political Science 804
  • Gender Studies 93
Replace Joshua D. Kertzer with:
Joshua D. Kertzer United States
Brian C. Rathbun United States
Yuen Foong Khong United Kingdom
David A. Welch Canada
Moses Shayo Israel
Randolph T. Stevenson United States
Marijke Breuning United States
Peter K. Enns United States
Stephen Van Evera United States
Scott Sigmund Gartner United States
Jonathan Mercer relative to Joshua D. Kertzer United States Joshua D. Kertzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joshua D. Kertzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Mercer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Mercer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Mercer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Mercer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Mercer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Mercer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Mercer. The network helps show where Jonathan Mercer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Mercer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Mercer Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Mercer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20232
3 20183
4 201734
5 20171
6 2014153
7 20141
8 201348
9 201216
10 2010144
11 2010209
12 200642
13 200681
14 2005180
15 2005187
16 19979
17 199622
18 19969
19 1995186

About Jonathan Mercer

Jonathan Mercer is a scholar working on Transplantation, Political Science and International Relations, Development, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (5 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Economic Sanctions and International Relations (2 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (2 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (781 citations), Development (77 citations), General Decision Sciences (39 citations), Sociology and Political Science (804 citations) and Gender Studies (93 citations). Jonathan Mercer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Kier, Douglas M. Dahl, Ketul Shah, Dicken S. C. Ko, Rajiv Narayan, Benjamin Hescott, Ted Natoli, Gustavo Stolovitzky, Junyuan Lin and Julio Sáez-Rodríguez. Their work appears in journals such as International Organization, International Security, Security Studies, Urology and Epilepsy & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026