Jonathan H. Chow

1.7k citations
60 papers · 760 indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan H. Chow

57 papers receiving 752 citations

Peers

Jonathan H. Chow
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 127
  • Internal Medicine 55
  • Emergency Medicine 125
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 54
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 198
Replace Tomáš Vymazal with:
Tomáš Vymazal Czechia
Daniel Eyraud France
Hussein D. Kanji Canada
Fabrice Daviaud France
Francesco Santini Italy
Anthony P. Borzotta United States
İlhan Paşaoğlu Türkiye
Timothy J. George United States
Jean‐Philippe Verhoye France
Silvia Cirri Italy
Jonathan H. Chow relative to Tomáš Vymazal Czechia Tomáš Vymazal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Tomáš Vymazal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan H. Chow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan H. Chow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan H. Chow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan H. Chow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan H. Chow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan H. Chow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan H. Chow. The network helps show where Jonathan H. Chow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan H. Chow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan H. Chow Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan H. Chow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202311
2 20232
3 202321
4 20239
5 20222
6 202122
7 20213
8 20217
9 20214
10 202110
11 20215
12 202037
13 20202
14 20206
15 201919
16 201918
17 201838
18 20185
19 201214
20 20100

About Jonathan H. Chow

Jonathan H. Chow is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Biochemistry, Internal Medicine and Hematology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 760 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (8 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (8 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (8 papers), Blood transfusion and management (7 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (7 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (127 citations), Internal Medicine (55 citations), Emergency Medicine (125 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (54 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (198 citations). Jonathan H. Chow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Michael Mazzeffi, Kenichi A. Tanaka, Michael T. McCurdy, Chetwyn C. H. Chan, Ezeldeen Abuelkasem, Reney Henderson, Samuel M. Galvagno, Pamela D. Unger, Guang‐Qian Xiao and Thomas M. Scalea. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Shock and Transfusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026