Jonathan Field

1.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 662 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Field is a scholar working on Pharmacology, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Field has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 662 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Pharmacology, 3 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Field's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers). Jonathan Field is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers). Jonathan Field collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Jonathan Field's co-authors include A. McColl, Peter D. White, Helen Smith, David Newell, Felicity L. Bishop, P. Ehrlich, Jason W. Brown, Deborah Kopansky-Giles, Kent Stuber and Gabriel C. Quintero Garzola and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Chiropractic & Manual Therapies and Clinical Chiropractic.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Field

6 papers receiving 597 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

General practitioners' perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey

1998 632 citations A. McColl, Helen Smith et al. BMJ profile →

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Jonathan Field	564	298	181	87	51	6	662
Diane S. Pravikoff	560 1.0×	159 0.5×	148 0.8×	369 4.2×	7 0.1×	15	649
A. Miles	255 0.5×	134 0.4×	54 0.3×	12 0.1×	6 0.1×	12	375
Eila Kankaanpää	165 0.3×	53 0.2×	25 0.1×	10 0.1×	25 0.5×	34	361
Stuart Barton	226 0.4×	112 0.4×	12 0.1×	9 0.1×	32 0.6×	20	406
Cara Evans	200 0.4×	133 0.4×	32 0.2×	3 0.0×	21 0.4×	22	406
G. Baker	96 0.2×	40 0.1×	15 0.1×	13 0.1×	9 0.2×	11	281
Prentiss Taylor	125 0.2×	91 0.3×	20 0.1×	3 0.0×	15 0.3×	6	343
Inga M. Zadvinskis	175 0.3×	65 0.2×	6 0.0×	38 0.4×	8 0.2×	24	299
Eeva Ketola	174 0.3×	169 0.6×	3 0.0×	22 0.3×	31 0.6×	20	411
Virginia Dunn	241 0.4×	115 0.4×	76 0.4×	106 1.2×	1 0.0×	14	449

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Field

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Field

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Field. The network helps show where Jonathan Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Field. Jonathan Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

Newell, David, et al.. (2024). The development of working alliance in early stages of care from the perspective of patients attending a chiropractic teaching clinic. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 32(1). 10–10. 2 indexed citations

Johnson, Claire, Bart N. Green, Jason W. Brown, et al.. (2020). Response of Practicing Chiropractors during the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Report. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 43(5). 403.e1–403.e21. 15 indexed citations

Hoekstra, Trynke, Iben Axén, Katie de Luca, et al.. (2020). BAck complaints in the elders - chiropractic (BACE-C): protocol of an international cohort study of older adults with low back pain seeking chiropractic care. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 28(1). 17–17. 5 indexed citations

Field, Jonathan. (2009). Back pain: what is happening when it becomes chronic?. Clinical Chiropractic. 12(1). 45–51. 4 indexed citations

Bielory, Leonard, et al.. (2003). Alternative treatment for allergy and asthma.. PubMed. 40 Suppl. 47–53. 4 indexed citations

McColl, A., Helen Smith, Peter D. White, & Jonathan Field. (1998). General practitioners' perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. BMJ. 316(7128). 361–365. 632 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact