Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Cable
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Cable's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Cable with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Cable more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Cable. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Cable. The network helps show where Jonathan Cable may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Cable
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Cable.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Cable based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Cable. Jonathan Cable is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cable, Jonathan, et al.. (2018). 'Can I click it? Yes you can': Football journalism, Twitter, and clickbait. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 15. 69–80.4 indexed citations
4.
Wu, Yan Yan, et al.. (2018). Digital Media Usage of Sensory Impaired Users in Wales 2018 Report. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire).
5.
Cable, Jonathan, et al.. (2018). Can I click it? Yes you can: Sport Journalism, Twitter, and Clickbait. Institutional Repository (IHS Vienna).1 indexed citations
6.
Dencik, Lina & Jonathan Cable. (2017). Digital Citizenship and Surveillance| The Advent of Surveillance Realism: Public Opinion and Activist Responses to the Snowden Leaks. International journal of communication. 11. 19.4 indexed citations
7.
Dencik, Lina & Jonathan Cable. (2017). The Advent of Surveillance Realism: Public Opinion and Activist Responses to the Snowden Leaks. Institutional Repository (IHS Vienna).45 indexed citations
Wahl‐Jorgensen, Karin, Lucy Bennett, & Jonathan Cable. (2016). Surveillance Normalization and Critique. Digital Journalism. 5(3). 386–403.11 indexed citations
12.
Bakir, Vian, Jonathan Cable, Lina Dencik, Arne Hintz, & Andrew McStay. (2015). Public feeling on privacy, security and surveillance: a report by DATA‐PSST and DCSS. Goldsmiths (University of London).5 indexed citations
13.
Cable, Jonathan. (2015). UK Public Opinion Review - Working Paper - An overview of public opinion polls since the Edward Snowden revelations in June 2013. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University).1 indexed citations
14.
Wahl‐Jorgensen, Karin, Mike Berry, Iñaki Garcia-Blanco, Lucy Bennett, & Jonathan Cable. (2015). Rethinking Balance and Impartiality in Journalism? A Case Study How the BBC Attempted and Failed to Change the Paradigm.2 indexed citations
15.
Bakir, Vian, Jonathan Cable, Lina Dencik, Arne Hintz, & Andrew McStay. (2015). Public Feeling on Privacy, Security and Surveillance. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire).2 indexed citations
16.
Cable, Jonathan & Andy Williams. (2014). Community engagement and hyperlocal news: A practical guide. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire).1 indexed citations
17.
Wahl‐Jorgensen, Karin, Richard Sambrook, Mike Berry, et al.. (2013). Breadth of opinion in BBC output. Goldsmiths (University of London).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.