Jonathan Bain

524 citations
26 papers · 215 indexed · h-index 9

Jonathan Bain

26 papers receiving 192 citations

Peers

Jonathan Bain
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • History and Philosophy of Science 73
  • Theoretical Computer Science 12
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 91
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 69
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 131
Replace Joy Christian with:
Joy Christian United Kingdom
Nicholas J. Teh United Kingdom
Dennis Lehmkuhl United States
Eleanor Knox United Kingdom
Niels Linnemann Switzerland
Jill North United States
Erhard Scheibe Germany
Robert Weingard United States
Vesselin Petkov Canada
Doreen Fraser Canada
Jonathan Bain relative to Joy Christian United Kingdom Joy Christian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joy Christian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Bain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Bain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Bain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Bain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Bain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Bain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Bain. The network helps show where Jonathan Bain may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Bain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Bain Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Bain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20202
2 20209
3 20195
4 20181
5 20171
6 201613
7 20132
8 201320
9 201321
10 201120
11
Motivating Structural Realist Interpretations of Spacetime
20091
12
Condensed Matter Physics and the Nature of Spacetime
20074
13 20055
14 200418
15 200314
16
Review of M. Jammer's Concepts of Mass in Contemporary Physics and Philosophy
20001
17 200026
18 20007
19 20001
20 19988

About Jonathan Bain

Jonathan Bain is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (15 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (5 papers), Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect (4 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (3 papers) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (73 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (12 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (91 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (69 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (131 citations). Jonathan Bain has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and China. Frequent co-authors include Max Jammer. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Synthese, Erkenntnis, Physics Today and Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026