Jonas Bohn

438 citations
6 papers · 99 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jonas Bohn

6 papers receiving 89 citations

Peers

Jonas Bohn
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Human-Computer Interaction 16
  • Information Systems and Management 13
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 31
  • Information Systems 18
  • Computer Science Applications 4
Replace Kerstin Forsberg with:
Kerstin Forsberg Sweden
Sophie Dupuy-Chessa France
A. Eduardo Dias Portugal
Ric Lowe Australia
Vivek Ramavajjala United States
Markus Gärtner Germany
Hafizul Fahri Hanafi Malaysia
Samuel Jenkins United States
Mark van Setten Netherlands
Jinhyuk Choi South Korea
Jonas Bohn relative to Kerstin Forsberg Sweden Kerstin Forsberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kerstin Forsberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonas Bohn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas Bohn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas Bohn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas Bohn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonas Bohn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas Bohn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas Bohn. The network helps show where Jonas Bohn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonas Bohn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonas Bohn Line = papers co-authored together Jonas Bohn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 200542
2 200421
3 202119
4 20207
5 20245
6 20245

About Jonas Bohn

Jonas Bohn is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Information Systems and Management, having authored 6 papers that have together received 99 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper), Interactive and Immersive Displays (1 paper), Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (1 paper), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (1 paper) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (16 citations), Information Systems and Management (13 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (31 citations), Information Systems (18 citations) and Computer Science Applications (4 citations). Jonas Bohn has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Vlad C. Coroamă, Friedemann Mattern, Michael Rohs, Frank Ückert, Sylvia Nürnberg, Lukas Schrader, Victoria Shabardina, Wojciech Makałowski, Reza Halabian and Yutaka Suzuki. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Psychiatry, G3 Genes Genomes Genetics, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Insights into Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact