Jonas Andersson

847 citations
45 papers · 590 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jonas Andersson

39 papers receiving 551 citations

Peers

Jonas Andersson
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Management Information Systems 128
  • Finance 90
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 83
  • General Energy 8
  • Statistics and Probability 39
Replace Lorenzo Peccati with:
Lorenzo Peccati Italy
Adli Mustafa Malaysia
Tianxiang Cui China
Kenneth D. Lawrence United States
Antonio Violi Italy
Markku Kallio Finland
Chang-Chun Lin Taiwan
Omar Rojas Mexico
Xiuzhi Sang China
Jen S. Shang United States
Jonas Andersson relative to Lorenzo Peccati Italy Lorenzo Peccati's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Lorenzo Peccati · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonas Andersson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas Andersson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas Andersson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas Andersson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonas Andersson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas Andersson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas Andersson. The network helps show where Jonas Andersson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonas Andersson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonas Andersson Line = papers co-authored together Jonas Andersson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016117
2 200765
3 200159
4 200156
5 200950
6 200049
7 199828
8 201426
9 201119
10 201313
11 201911
12 20099
13 20169
14 20098
15 20107
16 19986
17 20156
18 20155
19 20115
20
A note on the power of the GPH test for cointegration
19973

About Jonas Andersson

Jonas Andersson is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Management Information Systems, Environmental Engineering and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 45 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (10 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (6 papers), Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (4 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (4 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (4 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (3 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (3 papers) and Advanced Control Systems Optimization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (128 citations), Finance (90 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (83 citations), General Energy (8 citations) and Statistics and Probability (39 citations). Jonas Andersson has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Norway and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Apostolos Serletis, Johan Marklund, Gunnar Lidén, Magnus Bertilsson, Dimitris Karlis, Christer Friberg, Sven Axsäter, Jan Ubøe, Larry Greenberg and Olle Calles. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Statistical Modelling, Energy Policy, Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering and Ecological Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact