Jon M. Graham
- Surgery top 10%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Paul S. MylesLouise EllardJai N. DarvallJustin MandevilleDharshi KaralapillaiLaurence Weinberg
- Topics
- Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper)Nausea and vomiting management (1 paper)Pain Management and Opioid Use (1 paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of AnaesthesiaIndian Journal of Critical Care MedicineJournal of the Royal College of Physicians of London
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jon M. Graham
3 papers receiving 498 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Surgery 461
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 244
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 158
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 148
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 62
Countries citing papers authored by Jon M. Graham
This map shows the geographic impact of Jon M. Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon M. Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon M. Graham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jon M. Graham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon M. Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon M. Graham. The network helps show where Jon M. Graham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jon M. Graham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jon M. Graham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jon M. Graham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jon M. Graham. Jon M. Graham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31 | |
| 2 | A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trialsbreakdown → | 487 |
| 3 | 5 |
About Jon M. Graham
Jon M. Graham is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 3 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper), Nausea and vomiting management (1 paper) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (244 citations), Surgery (461 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (148 citations). Jon M. Graham has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul S. Myles, Louise Ellard, Jai N. Darvall, Justin Mandeville, Dharshi Karalapillai and Laurence Weinberg. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine and Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.