Jon Barker

6.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
130 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

Jon Barker is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Jon Barker has authored 130 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 112 papers in Signal Processing, 72 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 36 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Jon Barker's work include Speech and Audio Processing (106 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (69 papers) and Music and Audio Processing (51 papers). Jon Barker is often cited by papers focused on Speech and Audio Processing (106 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (69 papers) and Music and Audio Processing (51 papers). Jon Barker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Jon Barker's co-authors include Martin Cooke, Xu Shao, Stuart Cunningham, Emmanuel Vincent, Phil Green, Heidi Christensen, Ning Ma, Shinji Watanabe, Ricard Marxer and María Luisa García Lecumberri and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of the American Ceramic Society and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Jon Barker

124 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Hit Papers

An audio-visual corpus fo... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 250 500 750

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Jon Barker 2.8k 1.6k 757 535 365 130 3.3k
Guy J. Brown 2.5k 0.9× 843 0.5× 1.1k 1.5× 710 1.3× 475 1.3× 120 3.3k
Wai-Yip Chan 1.1k 0.4× 543 0.3× 303 0.4× 265 0.5× 343 0.9× 113 1.6k
Mike Brookes 1.1k 0.4× 585 0.4× 270 0.4× 441 0.8× 278 0.8× 133 1.6k
Dirk Van Compernolle 1.4k 0.5× 1.1k 0.7× 318 0.4× 357 0.7× 131 0.4× 144 2.0k
John G. Beerends 2.7k 1.0× 1.0k 0.6× 800 1.1× 1.1k 2.1× 837 2.3× 43 3.3k
H. J. M. Steeneken 2.8k 1.0× 1.1k 0.7× 1.8k 2.4× 835 1.6× 205 0.6× 52 3.8k
S. Davis 2.8k 1.0× 2.4k 1.5× 185 0.2× 114 0.2× 537 1.5× 5 3.6k
Takuya Yoshioka 4.7k 1.7× 3.3k 2.1× 542 0.7× 1.4k 2.6× 325 0.9× 150 5.3k
Toshio Irino 1.0k 0.4× 565 0.4× 649 0.9× 142 0.3× 161 0.4× 123 1.6k
Cees Taal 2.8k 1.0× 1.1k 0.7× 1.1k 1.5× 1.3k 2.4× 210 0.6× 28 3.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Barker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Barker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Barker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Barker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Barker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Barker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Barker. The network helps show where Jon Barker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jon Barker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jon Barker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jon Barker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jon Barker. Jon Barker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Akeroyd, Michael A., Jon Barker, Trevor J. Cox, et al.. (2024). The ICASSP SP Cadenza Challenge: Music Demixing/Remixing for Hearing Aids. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 93–94. 1 indexed citations
2.
Leglaive, Simon, Mostafa Sadeghi, Scott Wisdom, et al.. (2024). Objective and subjective evaluation of speech enhancement methods in the UDASE task of the 7th CHiME challenge. Computer Speech & Language. 89. 101685–101685. 4 indexed citations
3.
Greasley, Alinka, Trevor J. Cox, Michael A. Akeroyd, et al.. (2024). Muddy, muddled, or muffled? Understanding the perception of audio quality in music by hearing aid users. Frontiers in Psychology. 15. 1310176–1310176. 1 indexed citations
5.
Sutherland, Robert L., et al.. (2024). Using Speech Foundational Models in Loss Functions for Hearing Aid Speech Enhancement. 421–425. 3 indexed citations
6.
Cox, Trevor J., Alexander Miller, Bruno Fazenda, et al.. (2024). The cadenza woodwind dataset: Synthesised quartets for music information retrieval and machine learning. Data in Brief. 57. 111199–111199. 1 indexed citations
7.
Loweimi, Erfan, et al.. (2022). Acoustic Modelling From Raw Source and Filter Components for Dysarthric Speech Recognition. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing. 30. 2968–2980. 15 indexed citations
8.
Graetzer, Simone, Michael A. Akeroyd, Jon Barker, et al.. (2022). Dataset of British English speech recordings for psychoacoustics and speech processing research: The clarity speech corpus. Data in Brief. 41. 107951–107951. 13 indexed citations
9.
Graetzer, Simone, Jon Barker, Trevor J. Cox, et al.. (2021). Clarity-2021 Challenges: Machine Learning Challenges for Advancing Hearing Aid Processing. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 686–690. 42 indexed citations
10.
Doddipatla, Rama, et al.. (2020). On End-to-end Multi-channel Time Domain Speech Separation in Reverberant Environments. arXiv (Cornell University). 6389–6393. 35 indexed citations
11.
Xiong, Feifei, Jon Barker, & Heidi Christensen. (2018). Deep Learning of Articulatory-Based Representations and Applications for Improving Dysarthric Speech Recognition.. 1–5. 18 indexed citations
12.
Maddock, Steve, et al.. (2015). Investigating the impact of artificial enhancement of lip visibility on the intelligibility of spectrally-distorted speech.. AVSP. 93–98. 1 indexed citations
13.
Vincent, Emmanuel, Jon Barker, Shinji Watanabe, et al.. (2013). The second ‘CHiME’ speech separation and recognition challenge: Datasets, tasks and baselines. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 11 indexed citations
14.
Ma, Ning, Jon Barker, Heidi Christensen, & Phil Green. (2010). Distant microphone speech recognition in a noisy indoor environment: combining soft missing data and speech fragment decoding.. Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. 19–24. 1 indexed citations
15.
Christensen, Heidi & Jon Barker. (2010). Speaker turn tracking with mobile microphones: Combining location and pitch information. European Signal Processing Conference. 954–958. 2 indexed citations
16.
Barker, Jon & Xu Shao. (2007). Audio-Visual Speech Fragment Decoding. AVSP. 1 indexed citations
17.
Tesař, Václav & Jon Barker. (2002). Dominant vortices in impinging jet flows. Journal of Visualization. 5(2). 121–128. 9 indexed citations
18.
Green, Phil, Jon Barker, Martin Cooke, & Ljubomir Josifovski. (2001). Handling Missing and Unreliable Information in Speech Recognition.. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 24(2). 112–116. 11 indexed citations
19.
Barker, Jon & Frédéric Berthommier. (1999). Estimation of speech acoustics from visual speech features: A comparison of linear and non-linear models.. AVSP. 19. 17 indexed citations
20.
Barker, Jon, Frédéric Berthommier, & Jean‐Luc Schwartz. (1998). Is Primitive AV Coherence An Aid To Segment The Scene. AVSP. 103–108. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026