Jolyon Ford

654 total citations
47 papers, 363 citations indexed

About

Jolyon Ford is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jolyon Ford has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 363 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 9 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 8 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Jolyon Ford's work include Global Peace and Security Dynamics (7 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (6 papers) and Corporate Law and Human Rights (6 papers). Jolyon Ford is often cited by papers focused on Global Peace and Security Dynamics (7 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (6 papers) and Corporate Law and Human Rights (6 papers). Jolyon Ford collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Latvia and United Kingdom. Jolyon Ford's co-authors include James English, Justine Nolan, Clare Whitehead, Susan Walker, Penelope M. Sheehan, Melvin Barrientos Marzan, Kirsten R. Palmer, Ben W. Mol, Natasha Pritchard and Daniel L. Rolnik and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Academy of Management Perspectives.

In The Last Decade

Jolyon Ford

42 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jolyon Ford Australia 8 186 134 68 56 49 47 363
Walid A. Saleh United States 12 61 0.3× 61 0.5× 101 1.5× 6 0.1× 32 0.7× 46 378
Philippe Faucher France 12 42 0.2× 18 0.1× 83 1.2× 2 0.0× 23 0.5× 56 375
C. Waaldijk Netherlands 13 329 1.8× 32 0.2× 137 2.0× 3 0.1× 26 0.5× 48 649
Mausumi Das India 12 32 0.2× 253 1.9× 47 0.7× 2 0.0× 2 0.0× 29 568
William Miller United States 11 18 0.1× 13 0.1× 39 0.6× 11 0.2× 18 0.4× 28 305
Matthew D. Stephen Germany 14 3 0.0× 28 0.2× 184 2.7× 9 0.2× 67 1.4× 34 585
David Ortiz United States 5 7 0.0× 23 0.2× 136 2.0× 6 0.1× 28 0.6× 14 251
Alexandre Marinho Brazil 11 5 0.0× 4 0.0× 39 0.6× 6 0.1× 11 0.2× 51 347
Amy G. Cox United States 6 5 0.0× 11 0.1× 93 1.4× 4 0.1× 4 0.1× 23 304
S Gardó Hungary 9 28 0.2× 12 0.1× 5 0.1× 13 0.3× 50 330

Countries citing papers authored by Jolyon Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jolyon Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jolyon Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jolyon Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jolyon Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jolyon Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jolyon Ford. The network helps show where Jolyon Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jolyon Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jolyon Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jolyon Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jolyon Ford. Jolyon Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Marzan, Melvin Barrientos, Daniel L. Rolnik, Joanne Said, et al.. (2025). Geospatial Determinants of Maternal Overweight, Gestational Diabetes and Large for Gestational Age Birthweight in Melbourne During and After COVID ‐19 Lockdowns. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 65(4). 489–497.
2.
Ford, Jolyon. (2025). Populism and international law: the Morrison years in Australia. Australian Journal Of International Affairs. 79(3). 423–448.
3.
Marzan, Melvin Barrientos, Daniel L. Rolnik, Anthea Lindquist, et al.. (2024). Trends in maternal body mass index, macrosomia and caesarean section in first-time mothers during the pandemic: a multicentre retrospective cohort study of 12 Melbourne public hospitals. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 24(1). 706–706. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ford, Jolyon. (2023). Human Rights and Populism. 1 indexed citations
5.
Marzan, Melvin Barrientos, Daniel L. Rolnik, Natasha Pritchard, et al.. (2023). Reduction in spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm births in twin pregnancies during COVID-19 lockdown in Melbourne, Australia: a multicenter cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 23(1). 846–846.
6.
Hui, Lisa, Melvin Barrientos Marzan, Daniel L. Rolnik, et al.. (2022). Reductions in stillbirths and preterm birth in COVID-19–vaccinated women: a multicenter cohort study of vaccination uptake and perinatal outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 228(5). 585.e1–585.e16. 37 indexed citations
7.
Hui, Lisa, Melvin Barrientos Marzan, Daniel L. Rolnik, et al.. (2022). Increase in preterm stillbirths in association with reduction in iatrogenic preterm births during COVID-19 lockdown in Australia: a multicenter cohort study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 227(3). 491.e1–491.e17. 23 indexed citations
8.
Hui, Lisa, Melvin Barrientos Marzan, Daniel L. Rolnik, et al.. (2021). Collaborative maternity and newborn dashboard (CoMaND) for the COVID-19 pandemic: a protocol for timely, adaptive monitoring of perinatal outcomes in Melbourne, Australia. BMJ Open. 11(11). e055902–e055902. 4 indexed citations
9.
Ford, Jolyon. (2020). The Multilateral Human Rights System: Systemic Challenge or Healthy Contestation?. 35(1). 90. 1 indexed citations
10.
Ford, Jolyon, et al.. (2017). Empty Rituals or Workable Models? Towards a Business and Human Rights Treaty. University of New South Wales Law Journal. 40(3). 1 indexed citations
11.
Ford, Jolyon. (2016). Perspectives on the Evolving 'Business and Peace Debate'. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
12.
Ford, Jolyon. (2015). Regulating Business for Peace. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 13 indexed citations
13.
Ford, Jolyon. (2014). Engaging the private sector in post-conflict recovery - perspectives for SADPA. Institute for Security Studies Papers. 2014(269). 20. 2 indexed citations
14.
Ford, Jolyon. (2014). Engaging the Private Sector in Africa’s Peaceful Development. 2 indexed citations
15.
Ford, Jolyon, et al.. (2011). “Communication in an emergency”: using ISBAR to enhance a structured approach in MeL—a maternity e-learning program. Women and Birth. 24. S36–S36. 1 indexed citations
16.
Kuliukas, Lesley, Susan King, & Jolyon Ford. (2009). Just IN TIME: a multidisciplinary small group learning experience. The Clinical Teacher. 6(4). 272–276. 4 indexed citations
17.
Plessis, Max Du & Jolyon Ford. (2008). Justice and peace in a new Zimbabwe : transitional justice options. Institute for Security Studies Papers. 2008(164). 20. 2 indexed citations
18.
English, James, et al.. (2005). Long-Term Follow-up of Pain and Quality-of-Life Scores After Laparoscopic Adhesiolysis. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 60(8). 509–510. 1 indexed citations
19.
Ford, Jolyon, et al.. (2004). Clinical trials in developing countries : the plaintiff's challenge. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 2004(1). 1–17. 2 indexed citations
20.
Ford, Jolyon, et al.. (2004). Pain, quality of life and complications following the radical resection of rectovaginal endometriosis. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 111(4). 353–356. 125 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026