Jolesz Fa

506 citations
9 papers · 380 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jolesz Fa

9 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers

Jolesz Fa
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 146
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 79
  • Genetics 42
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 68
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 38
Replace R. Keßler with:
R. Keßler United States
C C Meltzer United States
R.L. Nicholson Canada
Elisabeth Springer Austria
Michael Nelles Germany
Holman Bl United States
Madeline Grade United States
Ferenc Jolesz United States
Curt Beil Germany
Sara Brockstedt Sweden
Jolesz Fa relative to R. Keßler United States R. Keßler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
R. Keßler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jolesz Fa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jolesz Fa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jolesz Fa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jolesz Fa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jolesz Fa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jolesz Fa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jolesz Fa. The network helps show where Jolesz Fa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Jolesz Fa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jolesz Fa Line = papers co-authored together Jolesz Fa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1993135
2
Interventional use of magnetic resonance imaging.
1994100
3
Magnetic resonance imaging therapy. Intraoperative MR imaging.
199697
4
Needle artifact localization in 3T MR images.
200621
5
Neurosurgical suite of the future. II.
200111
6
Intraoperative imaging revolutionizes therapy.
19957
7
Laser surgery benefits from guidance by MR.
19904
8
Mapping of normal and abnormal cerebrospinal fluid flow/motion patterns using steady state free precession imaging.
19863
9
Fast spin-echo technique extends versatility of MR.
19922

About Jolesz Fa

Jolesz Fa is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery and Genetics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (2 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (2 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (1 paper), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper), MRI in cancer diagnosis (1 paper) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (146 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (79 citations), Genetics (42 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (68 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (38 citations). Jolesz Fa has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include R. Kikinis, E Alexander, R. Kikinis, Colm P. O’Donnell, Mary Kimble, R. Stephen Smith, Nobuhiko Hata, Gábor Fichtinger and Samuel Patz. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact