John Yap

881 total citations
23 papers, 404 citations indexed

About

John Yap is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, John Yap has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 404 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 10 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 9 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in John Yap's work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (13 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (8 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers). John Yap is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (13 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (8 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers). John Yap collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Italy. John Yap's co-authors include James Moon, Derek J. Hausenloy, Shyam Kolvekar, Anna S Herrey, Daniel Sado, Giovanni Quarta, Andrew M. Taylor, Denis Pellerin, Cono Ariti and Andrew Flett and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery and JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

In The Last Decade

John Yap

20 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Yap United Kingdom 10 340 143 108 97 93 23 404
A. Bertaso Australia 10 351 1.0× 127 0.9× 89 0.8× 184 1.9× 46 0.5× 16 436
Tim Attmann Germany 14 306 0.9× 28 0.2× 217 2.0× 161 1.7× 179 1.9× 56 450
T.J. Spyt United Kingdom 10 245 0.7× 45 0.3× 97 0.9× 212 2.2× 102 1.1× 20 352
Ines Bühler Switzerland 8 254 0.7× 47 0.3× 118 1.1× 104 1.1× 39 0.4× 12 365
Andrea Grohmann Germany 8 229 0.7× 131 0.9× 40 0.4× 54 0.6× 65 0.7× 17 327
Paride Giannantoni Italy 10 711 2.1× 89 0.6× 51 0.5× 151 1.6× 27 0.3× 16 814
Takahiro Shojima Japan 9 187 0.6× 30 0.2× 66 0.6× 125 1.3× 144 1.5× 41 315
Liam P. Ryan United States 10 270 0.8× 46 0.3× 114 1.1× 202 2.1× 37 0.4× 20 349
Giulia Vettor Italy 12 425 1.3× 83 0.6× 18 0.2× 73 0.8× 32 0.3× 25 483
Vinay Bhole United Kingdom 13 237 0.7× 58 0.4× 323 3.0× 197 2.0× 226 2.4× 28 476

Countries citing papers authored by John Yap

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Yap's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Yap with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Yap more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Yap

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Yap. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Yap. The network helps show where John Yap may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Yap

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Yap. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Yap based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Yap. John Yap is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Jahangeer, Saleem, Mohamad Bashir, Amer Harky, & John Yap. (2018). Aberrant subclavian: new face of an old disease. Journal of Visualized Surgery. 4. 108–108. 6 indexed citations
4.
Balmforth, Damian, Amer Harky, John Yap, et al.. (2017). Is there a role for biomarkers in thoracic aortic aneurysm disease?. General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 67(1). 12–19. 25 indexed citations
5.
Treibel, Thomas A., Rebecca Kozor, Marianna Fontana, et al.. (2017). Sex Dimorphism in the Myocardial Response to Aortic Stenosis. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 11(7). 962–973. 82 indexed citations
6.
Bashir, Mohamad, Amer Harky, David Bleetman, et al.. (2017). Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Spoiled for Choice?. Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 29(3). 265–272. 15 indexed citations
7.
Rahmani, Benyamin, Rose Sheridan, Michael Mullen, et al.. (2016). In Vitro Hydrodynamic Assessment of a New Transcatheter Heart Valve Concept (the TRISKELE). Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research. 10(2). 104–115. 32 indexed citations
8.
Rahmani, Benyamin, Rose Sheridan, Michael Mullen, et al.. (2016). A new transcatheter heart valve concept (the TRISKELE): feasibility in an acute preclinical model. EuroIntervention. 12(7). 901–908. 17 indexed citations
9.
Aggarwal, Suneil, Nicola Delahunty, Markus Reinthaler, et al.. (2016). Balloon‐Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valves Can Be Successfully and Safely Implanted Transfemorally Without Balloon Valvuloplasty. Journal of Interventional Cardiology. 29(3). 319–324. 8 indexed citations
10.
Aggarwal, Suneil, Nicola Delahunty, Markus Reinthaler, et al.. (2014). TCT-761 Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valves Can Be Effectively And Safely Implanted Transfemorally Without Balloon Valvuloplasty. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 64(11). B222–B222. 2 indexed citations
11.
Candilio, Luciano, Abdul Malik, Matthew Barnard, et al.. (2014). A retrospective analysis of myocardial preservation techniques during coronary artery bypass graft surgery: are we protecting the heart?. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 9(1). 184–184. 16 indexed citations
12.
Reinthaler, Markus, Sunil Aggarwal, Rodney De Palma, et al.. (2014). Predictors of clinical outcome in transfemoral TAVI: Circumferential iliofemoral calcifications and manufacturer-derived recommendations. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology. 15(4). 297–305. 13 indexed citations
13.
Rahmani, Benyamin, et al.. (2012). TCT-109 A New Generation Transcatheter Heart Valve with a Novel Nanocomposite Material and Fully Retrievable Design. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 60(17). B34–B34. 3 indexed citations
14.
Flett, Andrew, Daniel Sado, Giovanni Quarta, et al.. (2012). Diffuse myocardial fibrosis in severe aortic stenosis: an equilibrium contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging. 13(10). 819–826. 137 indexed citations
15.
Ludman, Andrew, Derek J. Hausenloy, Girish Babu, et al.. (2011). Failure to recapture cardioprotection with high-dose atorvastatin in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Basic Research in Cardiology. 106(6). 1387–1395. 17 indexed citations
16.
Teoh, Kristine, et al.. (2011). Preoperative investigations in adult cardiac surgery patients. Surgery (Oxford). 30(1). 9–12. 2 indexed citations
17.
Tsim, Nicole & John Yap. (2007). Preoperative investigations in cardiac surgery in adults. Surgery (Oxford). 25(5). 208–210. 2 indexed citations
18.
West, Douglas, Eric Lim, Richard Trimlett, et al.. (2004). Determinants of Successful Endoscopic Internal Thoracic Artery Harvesting: A Prospective Analysis. The Heart Surgery Forum. 7(2). E179–E182. 1 indexed citations
20.
Yap, John, et al.. (1999). Right aortic arch with aberrant subclavian arteries: a cause of esophageal compression. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 68(6). 2331–2332. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026