Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
myo-Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. A second messenger for the hormonal mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ in liver.
Countries citing papers authored by John Williamson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John Williamson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Williamson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Williamson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Williamson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Williamson. The network helps show where John Williamson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Williamson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Williamson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Williamson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Williamson. John Williamson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Williamson, John. (2003). No hay consenso en el significado: reseña sobre el Consenso de Washington y sugerencias sobre los pasos a dar. 40(3). 10–13.2 indexed citations
7.
Abbott‐Chapman, Joan, et al.. (2001). Teaching competencies in the classroom: deconstructing teacher experiences. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 28(1). 1–24.8 indexed citations
Balassa, Béla & John Williamson. (1989). Les reussites du sud-est asiatique dans le commerce mondial : Corée - Hong Kong - Singapour - Taïwan. Economica eBooks.
14.
Williamson, John, et al.. (1987). Evaluating Principals for Your School District--20 Questions.. NASSP Bulletin. 71(501).1 indexed citations
15.
Walser, Mackenzie, et al.. (1981). Metabolism and clinical implications of branched chain amino and ketoacids : proceedings of the International Symposium on Metabolism and Clinical Implications of Branched Chain Amino and Ketoacids, held at the Kiawah Island Conference Center, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A., November 15-16, 1980. Elsevier eBooks.1 indexed citations
16.
Steenbergen, Charles, G. Deleeuw, & John Williamson. (1977). Tissue oxygen gradients in whole-tissue ischemia in rat heart. Federation Proceedings. 36(3).1 indexed citations
17.
Williamson, John, et al.. (1976). Control of energy production in cardiac muscle: effects of ischemia in acidosis.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 11. 521–31.6 indexed citations
18.
Williamson, John & Geoffrey E. Wood. (1976). The British Inflation: Indigenous or Imported?. American Economic Review. 66(4). 520–531.8 indexed citations
19.
Williamson, John, Sebastian Schaffer, Chelcy R. Ford, & B Safer. (1976). Contribution of tissue acidosis to ischemic injury in the perfused rat heart.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 53(3 Suppl). I3–14.106 indexed citations
20.
Williamson, John, et al.. (1972). REASONS FOR ACTIONS. Philosophical Books. 13(1). 26–28.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.