Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Renormalization-group approach to the Anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. II. Static properties for the asymmetric case
This map shows the geographic impact of John Wilkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Wilkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Wilkins more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Wilkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Wilkins. The network helps show where John Wilkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Wilkins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Wilkins.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Wilkins based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Wilkins. John Wilkins is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wilkins, John & Malte C. Ebach. (2013). The Nature of Classification: Relationships and Kinds in the Natural Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan eBooks.27 indexed citations
Wilkins, John. (2006). The Concept and Causes of Microbial Species. History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 28(3). 389–408.15 indexed citations
9.
Wilkins, John. (2006). Species, Kinds, and Evolution. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 26(4). 36–45.5 indexed citations
10.
Wilkins, John, et al.. (2006). ENHANCED MERCURY COLLECTION USING THE INDIGO AGGLOMERATOR.1 indexed citations
11.
Wilkins, John. (2005). Systematics and the Origin of Species: On Ernst Mayr's 100th Anniversary. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).4 indexed citations
12.
Wilkins, John. (2004). making a difference. Learning Disability Practice. 7(1). 8–10.4 indexed citations
Lam, Chi‐Chung, P. Sadayappan, Daniel Cociorva, M. Alouani, & John Wilkins. (1999). Performance Optimization of a Class of Loops Involving Sums of Products of Sparse Arrays.. PPSC.2 indexed citations
15.
Wilkins, John. (1998). What's in a meme? Reflections from the perspective of the history and philosophy of evolutionary biology. 2(1).39 indexed citations
16.
Wilkins, John, et al.. (1994). The life of luxury : Europe's oldest cookery book.2 indexed citations
Wilkins, John, et al.. (1985). Untersuchungen zu den Phönissen des Euripides.2 indexed citations
19.
Wilkins, John, et al.. (1984). Mercury, or, The secret and swift messenger : shewing how a man may with privacy and speed communicate his thoughts to a friend at any distance (1707) ; together with an abstract of Dr. Wilkins's Essay towards a real character and a philosophical language.
20.
Wilkins, John. (1973). The Discovery of a World in the Moone. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.