John W.F. Ketchum
- Geophysics top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 5%
- Paleontology top 5%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nicholas CulshawSandra M. BarrWouter BleekerN WodickaR. A. JamiesonJ. A. AyerValerie A. JacksonA Davidson
- Topics
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis (39 papers)Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (24 papers)earthquake and tectonic studies (21 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
John W.F. Ketchum
38 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Geophysics 1.5k
- Artificial Intelligence 736
- Geochemistry and Petrology 158
- Paleontology 138
- Atmospheric Science 118
Countries citing papers authored by John W.F. Ketchum
This map shows the geographic impact of John W.F. Ketchum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W.F. Ketchum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W.F. Ketchum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John W.F. Ketchum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W.F. Ketchum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W.F. Ketchum. The network helps show where John W.F. Ketchum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John W.F. Ketchum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John W.F. Ketchum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John W.F. Ketchum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John W.F. Ketchum. John W.F. Ketchum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 46 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | An outline of juvenile crust formation and recycling history in the Archaean Western Dharwar craton, from zircon in situ U-Pb dating and Hf-isotopic compositions | 20 |
| 5 | 52 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 86 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 63 | |
| 13 | 239 | |
| 14 | Evolution of the Central Slave Basement Complex, Slave Craton, Canada: U-Pb Constraints | 2 |
| 15 | 105 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 68 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 99 | |
| 20 | 55 |
About John W.F. Ketchum
John W.F. Ketchum is a scholar working on Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence and Earth-Surface Processes, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (39 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (24 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (1.5k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (158 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (736 citations). John W.F. Ketchum has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Culshaw, Sandra M. Barr, Wouter Bleeker, N Wodicka, R. A. Jamieson, J. A. Ayer, Valerie A. Jackson, A Davidson, M. Villeneuve and Sandra L. Kamo. Their work appears in journals such as Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Geology and Precambrian Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.