John W. Pearson

3.4k citations
109 papers · 2.4k indexed · h-index 27

John W. Pearson

102 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

John W. Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Computational Mathematics 45
  • Emergency Medicine 587
  • Numerical Analysis 229
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 412
  • Biotechnology 156
Replace Peter K. Moore with:
Peter K. Moore United States
Hien Tran United States
John Jeremy Rice United States
Takashi Sakai Japan
Hongyu Miao United States
Bing Hu China
Myung‐Hwan Kim South Korea
Mark Fleming United States
Miyoung Kim South Korea
Vittorio Rizzoli Italy
John W. Pearson relative to Peter K. Moore United States Peter K. Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22.3×
Peter K. Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Pearson. The network helps show where John W. Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Pearson Line = papers co-authored together John W. Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20242
3 20240
4 20240
5 20240
6 20235
7 20225
8 20221
9 20202
10 201726
11 20179
12
On the development of parameter-robust preconditioners and commutator arguments for solving Stokes control problems
20158
13
FAST ITERATIVE SOLVERS FOR CONVECTION-DIFFUSION CONTROL PROBLEMS ∗
201329
14 200112
15 199663
16 199518
17 19933
18
Drug therapy against a transplantable guinea pig leukemia.
19758
19 196717
20 19643

About John W. Pearson

John W. Pearson is a scholar working on Numerical Analysis, Computational Mathematics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 109 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (31 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (23 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (12 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (11 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (11 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (10 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (8 papers) and Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (45 citations), Emergency Medicine (587 citations) and Numerical Analysis (229 citations). John W. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joseph S. Redding, Andrew J. Wathen, M. A. Chirigos, Martin Stoll, Dan L. Longo, Louis Lasagna, Ronald L. Hornung, Margaret Beckwith, S D Chaparas and Jennifer Pestana. Their work appears in journals such as JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing and Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026