John W. Ludders
- Small Animals top 0.2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Equine top 0.5%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 2%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robin D. GleedHollis N. ErbGordon S. MitchellManuel Martin‐FloresJennifer A. RodeLuis CampoyPaula F. MoonJoanne Paul‐Murphy
- Topics
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (36 papers)Anesthesia and Pain Management (15 papers)Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (14 papers)
- Journals
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesAnesthesiologyAnesthesia & Analgesia
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John W. Ludders
63 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Small Animals 994
- Surgery 511
- Equine 275
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 248
- Animal Science and Zoology 152
Countries citing papers authored by John W. Ludders
This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Ludders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Ludders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Ludders more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Ludders
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Ludders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Ludders. The network helps show where John W. Ludders may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John W. Ludders
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John W. Ludders. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John W. Ludders based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John W. Ludders. John W. Ludders is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 38 | |
| 5 | 84 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 58 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 66 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | Cardiopulmonary Effects of Propofol Anesthesia in Chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) | 20 |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About John W. Ludders
John W. Ludders is a scholar working on Small Animals, Equine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (36 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (15 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (275 citations), Small Animals (994 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (248 citations). John W. Ludders has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robin D. Gleed, Hollis N. Erb, Gordon S. Mitchell, Manuel Martin‐Flores, Jennifer A. Rode, Luis Campoy, Paula F. Moon, Joanne Paul‐Murphy, Andrea L. Looney and Peter J. Pascoe. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Anesthesiology and Anesthesia & Analgesia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.