John W. Goodrum

2.1k citations
46 papers · 1.7k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

John W. Goodrum

46 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

John W. Goodrum
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 457
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.1k
  • Analytical Chemistry 156
  • Mechanical Engineering 557
  • Animal Science and Zoology 91
Replace H. Noureddini with:
H. Noureddini United States
A. W. Schwab United States
Meeta Sharma India
Lekha Charan Meher India
M.Á. Delgado Spain
Atanu Adhvaryu United States
Pedro Felizardo Portugal
Jon H. Van Gerpen United States
E. B. Bagley United States
Gholamreza Djelveh France
John W. Goodrum relative to H. Noureddini United States H. Noureddini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
H. Noureddini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Goodrum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Goodrum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Goodrum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Goodrum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Goodrum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Goodrum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Goodrum. The network helps show where John W. Goodrum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside John W. Goodrum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Goodrum Line = papers co-authored together John W. Goodrum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004218
2 2004193
3 2002139
4 2010108
5 2007100
6 200798
7 200369
8 200064
9 199664
10 200248
11 199645
12 199840
13 199440
14 199939
15 199232
16 199230
17 199829
18 198728
19 198922
20 197021

About John W. Goodrum

John W. Goodrum is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Food Science, Mechanical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biodiesel Production and Applications (18 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (12 papers), Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (6 papers), Lubricants and Their Additives (5 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (4 papers), Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (4 papers), Peanut Plant Research Studies (4 papers) and Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (457 citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.1k citations), Analytical Chemistry (156 citations), Mechanical Engineering (557 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (91 citations). John W. Goodrum has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel P. Geller, T. Adams, Mark A. Eiteman, Manuel Garcı̀a-Pèrez, K. C. Das, R. W. McClendon, Steven J. Knapp, Ido Seginer, W.M. Britton and J. Brian Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, Bioresource Technology, Fuel, Journal of Applied Physics and Applied Engineering in Agriculture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact