John Van Sickle

84 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

John Van Sickle
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.3k
  • Environmental Chemistry 901
  • Ecology 1.8k
  • Water Science and Technology 865
  • Soil Science 319
Replace Thomas F. Cuffney with:
Thomas F. Cuffney United States
Raymond P. Morgan United States
Rui Cortes Portugal
Ken M. Fritz United States
William B. Richardson United States
Matthew E. Baker United States
John M. Quinn New Zealand
Bill Freedman Canada
Leonard A. Smock United States
Scott T. Larned New Zealand
John Van Sickle relative to Thomas F. Cuffney United States Thomas F. Cuffney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Thomas F. Cuffney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Van Sickle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Van Sickle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Van Sickle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Van Sickle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Van Sickle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Van Sickle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Van Sickle. The network helps show where John Van Sickle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Van Sickle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Van Sickle Line = papers co-authored together John Van Sickle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008192
2 2016187
3 2004168
4 2008163
5 2009149
6 1996144
7 2000144
8 1990125
9 1996114
10 1997110
11 2006109
12 2004109
13 199095
14 200485
15 200578
16 197976
17 200768
18 199667
19 199667
20 200562

About John Van Sickle

John Van Sickle is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Chemistry, Water Science and Technology and Anthropology, having authored 87 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (25 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (24 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (18 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (14 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (12 papers), Water Quality and Resources Studies (6 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (6 papers) and Soil erosion and sediment transport (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.3k citations), Environmental Chemistry (901 citations), Ecology (1.8k citations), Water Science and Technology (865 citations) and Soil Science (319 citations). John Van Sickle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Zimbabwe and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Alan T. Herlihy, Charles P. Hawkins, Robert M. Hughes, Steven G. Paulsen, Stanley V. Gregory, David P. Larsen, Joan P. Baker, John L. Stoddard, David V. Peck and Spencer A. Peterson. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Applications, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, The Classical World, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica and Bulletin of Entomological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact