John Tresch

749 citations
28 papers · 199 indexed · h-index 7

John Tresch

20 papers receiving 155 citations

Peers

John Tresch
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Music 36
  • History and Philosophy of Science 35
  • Geography, Planning and Development 22
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 12
  • Anthropology 22
Replace Nina Sun Eidsheim with:
Nina Sun Eidsheim United States
Jennifer Lynn Stoever Ireland
Paul Valéry Germany
Anahid Kassabian United Kingdom
Étienne Souriau
P. N. Humble United Kingdom
David Serlin United States
Denis Vidal France
David Bellos United States
Hilde Hein United States
John Tresch relative to Nina Sun Eidsheim United States Nina Sun Eidsheim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Nina Sun Eidsheim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Tresch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Tresch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Tresch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Tresch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Tresch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Tresch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Tresch. The network helps show where John Tresch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 3 scholars most cited alongside John Tresch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Tresch Line = papers co-authored together John Tresch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20230
3 20230
4 20172
5
les-maitres-fous
20162
6 20161
7 201322
8
Emmanuel Grimaud et Zaven Paré, Le jour où les robots mangeront des pommes : conversations avec un Geminoid. Paris, Éditions Petra, coll. « Anthropologiques », 2011
20122
9 201248
10
Experimental ethics and the science of the meditating brain
20111
11 20116
12 20112
13 20100
14 20102
15 20075
16 20051
17 20040
18 20042
19 20031
20 19982

About John Tresch

John Tresch is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Music, Anthropology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 28 papers that have together received 199 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (6 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers), History of Science and Natural History (3 papers), Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis (3 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (2 papers) and French Urban and Social Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (36 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (35 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (22 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (12 citations) and Anthropology (22 citations). John Tresch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Emily I. Dolan, Pasquale Gagliardi and Simon Schaffer. Their work appears in journals such as Isis, Osiris, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Social Studies of Science and The Journal of Modern History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026