John T. Willis
- Religious studies top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Archeology top 5%
- Anthropology
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Helmer RinggrenGeoffrey William BromileyDennis PardeeJames L. CrenshawKevin G. O’ConnellDavid E. GreenR. E. ClementsDouglas A. Knight
- Topics
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation (30 papers)Archaeology and Historical Studies (12 papers)Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- Gender Place & CultureJournal of Biblical LiteratureJournal of the American Oriental Society
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John T. Willis
24 papers receiving 75 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Religious studies 76
- Sociology and Political Science 44
- Archeology 36
- Anthropology 16
- Political Science and International Relations 9
Countries citing papers authored by John T. Willis
This map shows the geographic impact of John T. Willis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. Willis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. Willis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John T. Willis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. Willis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. Willis. The network helps show where John T. Willis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John T. Willis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John T. Willis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John T. Willis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John T. Willis. John T. Willis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | A Civic Heart: Empowered Citizenship and Post-war Public Modernism | 1 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | Essays in Old Testament Ethics | 11 |
| 13 | The United States Court of Military Appeals - "Born Again" | 0 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | Theological dictionary of the Old Testament / edited by G. Johannes Botterweck and Helmer Ringgren ; translated by John T. Willis. | 5 |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About John T. Willis
John T. Willis is a scholar working on Religious studies, Development and Archeology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 123 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (30 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (12 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (76 citations), Archeology (36 citations) and Development (9 citations). John T. Willis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Helmer Ringgren, Geoffrey William Bromiley, Dennis Pardee, James L. Crenshaw, Kevin G. O’Connell, David E. Green, R. E. Clements, Douglas A. Knight, Kate Darian‐Smith and Martin Noth. Their work appears in journals such as Gender Place & Culture, Journal of Biblical Literature and Journal of the American Oriental Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.