John T. Landrum

6.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
56 papers, 5.3k citations indexed

About

John T. Landrum is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biochemistry and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, John T. Landrum has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 5.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Molecular Biology, 30 papers in Biochemistry and 17 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in John T. Landrum's work include Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (30 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (15 papers) and Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (14 papers). John T. Landrum is often cited by papers focused on Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (30 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (15 papers) and Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (14 papers). John T. Landrum collaborates with scholars based in United States, Poland and United Kingdom. John T. Landrum's co-authors include Richard A. Bone, Norman I. Krinsky, Camilo Ruiz, S. T. Mayne, Christopher M. Gómez, W. Robert Scheidt, Christopher A. Reed, Carl D. Hoff, Weili Wang and Zisca Dixon and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Analytical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

John T. Landrum

56 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Hit Papers

Lutein, Zeaxanthin, and the Macular Pigment 2001 2026 2009 2017 2001 2003 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John T. Landrum United States 30 3.0k 2.3k 1.8k 661 425 56 5.3k
Richard A. Bone United States 25 2.7k 0.9× 2.0k 0.9× 1.7k 0.9× 644 1.0× 249 0.6× 41 4.6k
T. George Truscott United Kingdom 44 2.3k 0.8× 2.6k 1.1× 327 0.2× 126 0.2× 1.5k 3.6× 157 7.3k
Colin F. Chignell United States 53 369 0.1× 3.9k 1.7× 314 0.2× 196 0.3× 2.0k 4.6× 260 9.7k
J. Mark Petrash United States 44 231 0.1× 3.0k 1.3× 524 0.3× 311 0.5× 244 0.6× 123 6.2k
Ruth Edge United Kingdom 33 1.3k 0.4× 893 0.4× 92 0.1× 86 0.1× 1.2k 2.9× 128 4.0k
T. G. Truscott United Kingdom 23 730 0.2× 917 0.4× 201 0.1× 49 0.1× 756 1.8× 57 2.5k
Yashige Kotake United States 34 248 0.1× 1.0k 0.5× 113 0.1× 107 0.2× 696 1.6× 138 3.7k
Edward J. Land United Kingdom 43 1.1k 0.4× 2.1k 0.9× 85 0.0× 39 0.1× 1.8k 4.2× 137 5.9k
Marisa Helena Gennari de Medeiros Brazil 50 519 0.2× 2.9k 1.3× 32 0.0× 142 0.2× 874 2.1× 168 7.4k
Dimitri A. Svistunenko United Kingdom 39 172 0.1× 3.4k 1.5× 132 0.1× 78 0.1× 242 0.6× 114 5.9k

Countries citing papers authored by John T. Landrum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John T. Landrum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. Landrum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. Landrum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John T. Landrum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. Landrum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. Landrum. The network helps show where John T. Landrum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John T. Landrum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John T. Landrum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John T. Landrum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John T. Landrum. John T. Landrum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Landrum, John T., et al.. (2022). Analysis of macular carotenoids in the developing macaque retina: The timeline of macular pigment development. Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology. 674. 215–253. 1 indexed citations
2.
Bone, Richard A. & John T. Landrum. (2010). Dose-dependent response of serum lutein and macular pigment optical density to supplementation with lutein esters. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 504(1). 50–55. 81 indexed citations
3.
Landrum, John T.. (2009). Carotenoids : Physical, Chemical, and Biological Functions and Properties. CRC Press eBooks. 143 indexed citations
4.
Landrum, John T., et al.. (2009). The conformation of end-groups is one determinant of carotenoid topology suitable for high fidelity molecular recognition: A study of β- and ε-end-groups. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 493(2). 169–174. 11 indexed citations
5.
Bone, Richard A., et al.. (2007). Validity of Macular Pigment Optical Density Measurements by Heterochromatic Flicker Photometry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 48(13). 2131–2131. 2 indexed citations
6.
Bone, Richard A., et al.. (2007). Macular pigment response to a supplement containing meso-zeaxanthin, lutein and zeaxanthin. Nutrition & Metabolism. 4(1). 12–12. 78 indexed citations
7.
Rosenthal, Julie, Jonghyeon Kim, Darby J. S. Thompson, et al.. (2006). Dose-Ranging Study of Lutein Supplementation in Persons Aged 60 Years or Older. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(12). 5227–5227. 51 indexed citations
8.
Bone, Richard A., et al.. (2004). Macular pigment and the edge hypothesis of heterochromatic flicker photometry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 1294–1294. 1 indexed citations
9.
Landrum, John T., et al.. (2004). Influence of Lutein Dosage on Macular Pigment Response. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 1290–1290. 1 indexed citations
10.
Bone, Richard A. & John T. Landrum. (2004). Heterochromatic flicker photometry. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 430(2). 137–142. 68 indexed citations
11.
Bone, Richard A., et al.. (2004). Macular pigment and the edge hypothesis of flicker photometry. Vision Research. 44(26). 3045–3051. 23 indexed citations
12.
Bone, Richard A., et al.. (2003). Macular Pigment and Serum Response to Dietary Supplementation with Meso-zeaxanthin. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 405–405. 5 indexed citations
13.
Bone, Richard A., et al.. (2000). Lutein and Zeaxanthin in the Eyes, Serum and Diet of Human Subjects. Experimental Eye Research. 71(3). 239–245. 146 indexed citations
14.
Landrum, John T., et al.. (1999). [40] Analysis of zeaxanthin distribution within individual human retinas. Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology. 299. 457–467. 50 indexed citations
15.
Landrum, John T., et al.. (1997). A One Year Study of the Macular Pigment: The Effect of 140 Days of a Lutein Supplement. Experimental Eye Research. 65(1). 57–62. 353 indexed citations
16.
Bone, Richard A., et al.. (1997). Distribution of Lutein and Zeaxanthin Stereoisomers in the Human Retina. Experimental Eye Research. 64(2). 211–218. 307 indexed citations
17.
Landrum, John T., et al.. (1996). The Macular Pigment: A Possible Role in Protection from Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Advances in pharmacology. 38. 537–556. 151 indexed citations
18.
Landrum, John T., et al.. (1992). Optical density spectra of the macular pigmentin vivo andin vitro. Vision Research. 32(1). 105–110. 192 indexed citations
19.
Bone, Richard A. & John T. Landrum. (1992). [33] Distribution of macular pigment components, zeaxanthin and lutein, in human retina. Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology. 213. 360–366. 53 indexed citations
20.
Bone, Richard A., et al.. (1985). Preliminary identification of the human macular pigment. Vision Research. 25(11). 1531–1535. 356 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026