John T. Chow
Impact in
- Otorhinolaryngology top 10%
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Papers in
- Surgery 6
- Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies 4
-
- RNA modifications and cancer 2
- Co-authors
- David Sidransky (7 shared papers)Steven A. Ahrendt (5 shared papers)Jin Jen (4 shared papers)Claus Ferdinand Eisenberger (4 shared papers)Stephen C. Yang (1 shared paper)Naomi Halachmi (1 shared paper)Scott L. Wehage (1 shared paper)Wu Li (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography (1 paper)Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (1 paper)Journal of Surgical Research (1 paper)International Journal of Cancer (1 paper)Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John T. Chow
10 papers receiving 587 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Otorhinolaryngology 39
- Cancer Research 122
- Oncology 201
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 104
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 79
Countries citing papers authored by John T. Chow
This map shows the geographic impact of John T. Chow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. Chow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. Chow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John T. Chow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. Chow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. Chow. The network helps show where John T. Chow may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John T. Chow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 187 | |
| 2 | Alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking increase the frequency of p53 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. | 2000 | 120 |
| 3 | 2007 | 70 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 52 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 48 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 47 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 1 |
About John T. Chow
John T. Chow is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research and Oncology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (4 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Liver Diseases and Immunity (2 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (1 paper), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (1 paper) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (39 citations), Cancer Research (122 citations), Oncology (201 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (104 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (79 citations). John T. Chow has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Sidransky, Steven A. Ahrendt, Jin Jen, Claus Ferdinand Eisenberger, Stephen C. Yang, Naomi Halachmi, Scott L. Wehage, Wu Li, Stephen C. Yang and Wu Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Journal of Surgical Research, International Journal of Cancer and Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.